Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Bjorn Lomborg and the Long Con

Not to Be Missed: Mashey Bashing Bjorn

Frequent DeSmogBlog comment contributor John R. Mashey does a lovely job deconstructing Bjorn Lomborg's fictional liberalism in a post here at The Way Things Break.

Lomborg's con is to argue that climate change, while a valid concern, is a much lower priority than dealing with starvation and disease in the developing world. Mashey points out, however, that buddy Bjorn is too busy enriching himself on the denier think tank speaker circuit to actually spend any time advocating for an increase in global aid.

Mashey's more polite than I would have been, but he also shreds Lomborg and his entire argument to better effect.


What's next?

Not bashing, just analysis... but thanks for the plug

And I'm sorry to say I forgot to put Senator Inhofe on the list of those fond of Lomborg, as  per:

http://www.desmogblog.com/lomborg-leave-global-warming-to-our-kids-because-its-too-expensive-for-us

and I forgot to add in Gary Yohe's comments:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/aug/22/climatechange.carbonemissions

Of course, one can  *advocate* for anything, but the real question is how one spends one's own time and money, and if one is well-connected to government, how strongly one lobbies for those causes.

 

 

Casual use of the term "bashing"

Apologies. I didn't intend to imply violent intent; mostly I was enjoying the alliteration.

Still, Lomborg should take notice that when he is confronted with a careful and articulate analysis, he can only retreat to nurse the bruising to his pretty (if incredibly cynical) hypothesis.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers