Boehner: What's the Big Deal with CO2, Anyways?

Thu, 2009-04-23 00:32Jeremy Jacquot
Jeremy Jacquot's picture

Boehner: What's the Big Deal with CO2, Anyways?

The award for this week’s most understated headline goes to Politico’s Lisa Lerer for this little doozy: “GOP grapples with climate confusion.” Though little of her article actually breaks new ground, it perfectly encapsulates the Republicans’ current predicament – that of being stuck between a rock and a hard place when it comes to taking action on climate change.

On the one hand, the Republicans need to marshall their resources and come up with a coherent alternative to the proposed Democratic plan, lest they wish to lose the PR game and suffer another legislative defeat in the House of Representatives (the Senate, unfortunately, will be a much larger hurdle to overcome); on the other, they need to be wary of not alienating their base by devoting too much time to addressing a “hoax.”

For the moment, the Republican leadership seems to have discarded the wiser course of action – formulating an alternative to the Waxman-Markey climate bill that could peel off moderates from the Democratic ranks – in favor of a full-throated denialist approach. (I guess you can’t blame them, since their efforts to twist the science and numbers have proven equally futile.) Step forward House Minority Leader John Boehner.

When asked by George Stephanopoulos to present the Republican “answer” to climate change during a recent interview on ABC News, Boehner scoffed at the notion that high carbon dioxide emissions could be problematic. “Every time we exhale, we exhale carbon dioxide,” Boehner opined, calling to mind the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s memorable ad celebrating the virtues of “our friend,” CO2.

After inexplicably labeling carbon dioxide a “carcinogen,” he skirted the question of whether greenhouse gases contributed to climate change, only saying “it’s clear we’ve had change in our climate,” before retreating to the position that “everyone in America is looking for the proper answer.” That “proper answer” proved elusive, as Boehner continued to dodge and weave his way past an increasingly exasperated Stephanopoulos’ repeated entreaties.

It may not have been a very enlightening interview (to put it mildly), but it fell well within the norm of typical Republican speak – even discounting the likes of Senator James Inhofe, who has been paving the way for his party. Michael Steele, the chairman of the Republican National Committee and nominal head of the party, raised more than a few eyebrows when he boldly proclaimed: “We are cooling. We are not warming. The warming you see out there, the supposed warming, and I am using my finger quotation marks here, is part of the cooling process.”

And let’s not forget Rep. John Shimkus, who dismissed the need for timely climate action by arguing that the dinosaurs had managed to thrive in an era of much higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels:
“Today we have about 388 parts per million [of carbon dioxide] in the atmosphere,” Shimkus said. “I think in the age of the dinosaurs, when we had most flora and fauna, we were probably at 4,000 parts per million. There is a theological debate that this is a carbon-starved planet, not too much carbon.”

With talking points like these, who needs the Democrats?

You know your party is in trouble when Sarah Palin – putting aside her ulterior motives – appears to be one of the few prominent voices of “reason.”

Comments

So basically the rupublicans answer to climate change is that they are going to ignore it… Nice

Very intersting article, that’s a good analyse. Family Seo thanks you to share it.

 

Great information. I got lucky and found your site from a random Google search. Fortunately for me, this topic just happens to be something that I’ve been trying to find more info on for research purpose. Keep us the great and thanks a lot.

I have seen allot of people make an effort to discus and write about this subject…and i have seen a lot of failures…but you have hit the nail on the HEAD….I agree totally and am looking forward to your view on other subjects telefonkatalogen.biz

boy, you guys should have him speak publicly as often as you can. my side wouldn’t have a chance! one world governance coming up!!!!

Its such a long passage .What to say…but good contribution

Thanks

Alex Orthopedics

And what does this 350 number even mean?

350 is the number that leading scientists say is the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide–measured in “Parts Per Million” in our atmosphere. 350 PPM–it’s the number humanity needs to get back to as soon as possible to avoid runaway climate change.

apģērbu interneta veikals

In my opinion it is a bit late now to change in enough time to actually make a difference, that being said we shouls all still change and educate future generations in global warming and the dangers of.

Well…you guys should have him speak publicly as often as you can. my side wouldn’t have a chance! one world governance coming up. clubpenguincheats

a difference, that being said we shouls all still change and educate future generations in global warming and the dangers Rochville University

wonderful post, i must say it. thanks again. 

Some greenhouse gases like the CO2 are needed to protect harmful ozone from causing life threatening damages to earth’s atmosphere. This needs to be addressed by the Congress seriously and hastily by keeping aside party differences or it will be too late. As a US citizen, i expect the two rival parties - Republican and Democratic - to at least stay united in this critical matter of national importance.
denver personal injury

Well I think global warming is really an important issue.And it needs attention this time otherwise its going to affect the entire world in times to come.

Yeast Infection

great post and the public were able to know about the effects caused by CO2. thanks for sharing.
regards,
jamas - Bidz.com

great post and the public were able to know about the effects caused by CO2.
live score service—
basketball live score—
live scoring–
hockey live scores–
scores lives

wonderful post, i must say it. thanks again.
Kamagra wholesale—
kamagra supplier—
buy tadalafil—
buy viagra

With talking points like these, who needs the Democrats?
Essay—
Essays–
Essay Writing–
Essay Help–
Custom Essay

Well…you guys should have him speak publicly as often as you can.
Essay| Essay Writing| Essay Help| Custom Essay| Buy Essay|

good article whith a lot of ideas livejasmin

Well, thanks, it was really interesting read some ideas int this article.

Legendary.lv - Tavs milakais stiligu apgerbu interneta veikals
Legendary.lv - Твой любимый интернет магазин модной одежды

Not only the government but also us should help with the conservation of our planet. global warming should be prevented.

Please fix error on this page, when i open I see message:

user warning: Table ‘desmogblog_dev.slashcomments_ratings’ doesn’t exist query: SELECT * FROM slashcomments_ratings WHERE cid = 715645 in /mnt/www/desmogblog/sites/all/modules/slashcomments/slashcomments.module on line 679.
nail designs

[x]
bird species, climate change, audubon socity

An alarming new study published Tuesday by the National Audubon Society says that almost half the bird species in the continental United States and Canada are already threatened by climate change.

The study — Audubon’s Birds and Climate Change Report — finds that 126 species will lose more than 50 per cent of their current ranges by mid-century with no possibility of relocating if global warming continues at its current pace.

A...

read more