Canadian bank report plugs pollution taxes in climate-change fight
The bank’s chief economist says taxing those who actually pollute creates an incentive to change behavior. The tax should be applied when pollution is created, he said. Thus, the consumer would pay for car pollution, and industry would pay for pollution associated with production.
In an emissions-trading system, companies that reach their emissions targets can sell credits to other companies who can't seem to lower their greenhouse gas output.
Joining an international system might not appeal to Canadians at the moment, the report said, but Canada should get involved in a domestic emissions-trading scheme soon with an eye to connecting to the bigger markets later.













Price on pollution, sure, but
That's a flame, JIK
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf next door hot milfs [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] hot milfs[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 milf next door] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]
Flame?
Agreed, not a flame
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf hunter milf cruiser [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] milf hunter[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 hot milf] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]
European targets
Unlike you
Ever heard of too much of a good thing?
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf seeker milf hunter [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] hot milfs[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 milf next door] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]
Errr...
Did you read the article Johan or this another drive-by smearing?
To quote:
"They advocate a policy that combines emissions regulations, taxes, subsidies and a trading system for emissions credits – a varied approach they say would mitigate the impact on the economy."
Here's some more information on emissions trading.
And here's a picture if you prefer that:
As I said, tax on pollution,
Again
"They advocate a policy that combines emissions regulations, taxes, subsidies and a trading system for emissions credits – a varied approach they say would mitigate the impact on the economy."
And again:
And to add:
Cars are a huge emitter of CO2, if we bring in higher fuel efficiency standards (i.e. we burn less gas to go further) we emit less C02.
And finally to quote the article again:
"The revenues would be shifted into cutting taxes in other areas or to finance subsidies that further help the environment."
Seriously, I don't get your point!?
CO2 is not a pollutant
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf seeker milf next doors [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] milf cruiser[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 milf cruiser] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]
A pollutant is defined as
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf sex milf porn [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] milf next door[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 milf porn] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]
By that definiton
agreed
We just end up having to waste our time refuting and explaining his wierd rationsles for not doing anything about global warming.
Bad little denier jokehan!
ah, gotcha
ak077390325 http://milfxxxpass.com/#0 - milf next door milf porn [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com/#2] milf sex[/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com/#3 milf cruiser] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com/#4[/link]