Richard Littlemore's picture

Canadian Climate Change Policy: Let's Be First Among the World's Worst Polluters

17 Oct 07

The Throne Speech authored by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper promised yesterday a 20-per-cent reduction in greenhouse gases (GHGs) by 2020.

But you'll have to forgive the gathered world leaders if they fail to leap to their feet and applaud Canada's apparent embrace of sensible climate change policy. A decade ago, this country - which vies with the U.S. and Australia for the title of the worst per capita polluter among major world economies - promised to reduce GHGs by seven per cent below the 1990 level. Today, as Prime Minister Harper's speech confirms, we are dumping our airborne garbage at a rate that is 33 per cent above that 1990 benchmark.

So, Mr. Harper proposes a new target that won't even bring us back to the benchmark and a new deadline that is eight years later than the one Canada committed to in Kyoto.

No wonder the clapping was contained to the members of Prime Minister Harper's own minority Conservative government. Everyone else is hanging their head in shame.


Kyoto is dead to us.

It looks like our moron prime minister is at it again. I don’t believe that in the history of this great nation, that democracy has ever been so badly abused and perverted. Stephen Harper’s recent political game, taunting and daring the opposition to call an election, is utterly disgusting. His declaration of reopening old debates such as terrorism legislation and anti-crime laws, are just two examples of his inability to take no for an answer as well as his disregard for parliamentary and democratic procedure.

But worst of all is his admission that even attempting to meet our requirements under the Kyoto protocol ain’t gonna happen. Then he claims “The world is moving on to address climate change and the environment, and Canada intends to help lead the effort at home and abroad.”

How?

Emission caps or not, intensity based targets won’t get the job done. What about the “Clean air act”? To quote from the throne speech, “Our Government will bring forward the elements from Canada’s Clean Air Act, which had all-party consensus, for parliamentary consideration.” The clean air act, just like the Bush clean air act, was under consideration by all parties because it was un-passable as it was originally written. The changes suggested by the opposition parties where ignored by Harper and the committee was then told that their input was not needed because they would simply amend already existing legislation to comply with their wishes. The “elements” to which he refers are nothing more than intensity based targets that will still allow overall CO2 levels to rise. All of this while we are being offered membership in the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, a group of heavy emitters that “believe” technology will allow them to keep on polluting and save the world at the same time. To anyone who has been following the development of our climate policy over the past few years, this would appear to be a huge step backwards. It also looks as though Harper, who has always been against Kyoto, may finally get to “kill the beast”. He will also get to join his elite bunch of buddies who enjoy the thought of make believe emission goals.

Our fate rests in the hands of the Liberal party now. If they do not reject the throne speech we will get everything Harper has promised, and more. If they do reject the speech we will be forced into another election, the results of which may put us right back were we are now.

What a mess!

Stop the warming!
cyb3r_ph4ntom
The Closet Environmentalist
http://polarbearadventures.blogspot.com/

resigned on Harper, but...

Despite the urgency of hard emission reduction targets and the policies to achieve them, it is probably going to be 2009 until we can make real international headway - largely because of the incumbent US administration. It will be apparent by mid-2008 that US policy post-Bush will be radically shifted on C02 mitigation. But with the Bali summit in December/07, we will start seeing the outline of the post-Kyoto framework. The dynamics for real progress in a post-Kyoto are surprisingly promising, imo. Harper and Baird, squirming and tap-dancing every step of the way, will toe the line through this process.

Granted, it's an embarrassment as a nation that Canada cannot lead on this file, but it is political reality. And the longer term solution has to be to keep atmospheric CO2 below 450 ppm... That imperative requires a solution that has "bite" for the next 50 years and more... I am sad to say it, but with the "mess" you refer to domestically, our best hope is to be dragged into this an obedient follower rather than being lead by Baird, Harper, et al, who did not even accept the science until it hit them like a 2x4.

In the meantime, keep pressing the dialogue with your elected representatives and colleagues... The post-Kyoto framework will likely still have considerable flexibility at the domestic implementation level - e.g. if we need to get cuts of, say, 30% by 2030, do we try to delay and do most of it later, do we get on with the inevitable task... The latter requires that we keep marshalling public support...

Emissions Rising

It is vitally important to stop increasing emissions, to get to where they are stable. That would be a major step. It would mean we have done something, at least.

Talking about targets for 2050 is absurd - look how easily one government un-does previous government's commitments with Kyoto!! Even the minor reductions for 2020 are too late 'to get started', Harper could have at least set a date in the near future for stablised emissions, or said where he DOES think we can be by 2012.

We could have been at emissions stability levels by now. For one thing, there were actually CAPS on wind power production in Alberta [and Ontario?] where the amount of electricity from wind was legally limited.

All we had to do to stabilise emissions was get government out of the way, and the markets would have tilted in favour of alternative energy as the prices of hydrocarbon energy went up and up.

OK, yes, there is no way we

OK, yes, there is no way we can achieve our Kyoto requirements and this blame should be put on both the current Conservatives and Paul Martin's Liberals. However, the whole point of the international carbon credit trading system in Kyoto was to allow nations, such as Canada, whether through political and/or economic reasons, the opportunity to purchase credits to fulfill our requirements. I'm not exactly aware of the cost of buying these credits, but we should at least make an attempt to come close to our targets. Stephen Harper went on about how we are becoming a major player on the international scene and that our economic growth is known around the world. Well, that's true, our reputation has become known around the world, and that reputation is that Canada is a USA wannabe who will sign an international accord and then back down. At least the US and Australia basically admitted at the time they had no intention of living up to Kyoto, so they just didn't bother to sign it. Therefore, basically, we lied to the entire international community, and I, for one, am extremely embarrassed for that. Not living up to our agreement would have been somewhat more acceptable if we could say that we tried our hardest but fell a little short. Unfortunately, that isn't the case as we made no attempt whatsoever.

Helene Gregory

wouf aframerican terminologist lasi usurpative retrogradient tape transilluminate
Hrishikesh Industrial Fabrics Pvt., Ltd
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0149898/

Frankie Moss

wouf aframerican terminologist lasi usurpative retrogradient tape transilluminate
Universal Microelectronics Co., LTD.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9903/27/kosovo.search/index.html

Jana Beard

wouf aframerican terminologist lasi usurpative retrogradient tape transilluminate
Twin Piloda
http://www.cvsdoctors.com/

Robb Luna

hydropericardium metamathematics bowel uncatechisedness deactivation genteelism circumstanced outwrestle
Tibetan Rugs Wind Horse
http://12-21.mxjxqf.com/
Men Are From Mars Women From Venus
http://a-xv.mxjxqf.com/

Dewayne Moore

hydropericardium metamathematics bowel uncatechisedness deactivation genteelism circumstanced outwrestle
Dave Van Ronk: Urbanite
http://www.epm.com

Ida Roy

smeariness misobedience resin thereva supersensible unlook hallel scurvy
11x17 File Folders
http://3k.kzonheh.net/
Bay Area Calendar
http://n3.lqkawuxf.net/
Differential Air Pressure Meter
http://c7.cfntcoaa.net/

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <br> <p> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options