“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Carbon Tax: (Unlikely) allies throw BC NDP a lifeline

The BC NDP have been offered two elegant lines of retreat from a damaging and divisive election policy condemning BC’s continent-leading climate change carbon tax.

First, Metro Vancouver mayors have let it be known that they would like the revenue from the carbon tax to pay for regional transit. That’s a perfect solution for the NDP. Rather than maintaining their opposition to the tax - and continuing to sow outrage among erstwhile environmental supporters -NDP leader Carole James could acknowledge the merit of the mayors’ request and agree to leave the tax in place, redirecting its proceeds to transit options.

The second potential lifeline came in a column from Victoria Times-Colonist editorial page editor Dave Obee, who pointed out the elemental weakness of the NDP’s position and advised: “The best bet for the NDP would be to quietly drop the talk about the carbon tax and suggest other ways to curb emissions.”

Picking up on either one of these options would help restore James’ credibility among former environmental supporters and would show her as a reasonable, adaptable leader - and the mayors’ policy proposal, especially, seemed calculated to give James a way out of her current trouble.

Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, inset, is a former NDP Member of the Legislative Assembly. He voted against the tax while still in the Legislature, but he has incurred the wrath of his (ex?) party by speaking up in favour of it on at least one occasion since.  Rather than continuing to bash Robertson and others like him - rather than paint themselves deeper into a corner on an issue that likely won’t win right-wing votes, but will almost certainly lose votes on the environmental “left” -  James could just do the right thing and swing her support (however begrudgingly) behind the tax.Then everybody (with the potential exception of her Liberal opponent Gordon Campbell) would be happy.

This article is another in Desmogblog's ongoing coverage of the British Columbia 2009 election. We believe this is key election in the history of Climate Change policy in North America. Click here to read more about why we are are covering this election in such detail.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

You’re dead on RIchard. I think this is a less-than-subtle attempt by Gregor Robertson to provide an out for Carole James and the NDP on their ill-conceived “axe the tax” campaign. The strategists behind the axe the tax, who I understand to be Bill Tielman and Gerry Scott have totally miscalculated where the public is on this issue and this is a chance for them to rectify the situation without losing too much face.

The Obama Administration and the new Congress are being called upon to address 21st Century climate realities. In a carbon-constrained world, a permanent and increasing U.S. carbon tax is essential to reduce the emissions that are driving global warming.

 

cheers,

Games For Girls

obert Shapiro, chair and cofounder of the U.S. Climate Task Force and former Undersecretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs, makes a compelling political case that “the costs and lessons of the financial crisis may effectively swamp the prospects for cap-and-trade. If cap-and-trade has become a dead policy walking, those who care deeply about climate change will find that a carbon tax system has become the last, reasonable policy standing. regards, Electric Train Sets

This is because all cap & trade systems are based on limiting growth in emissions above their current level – forcing companies to become more emission efficient if they are to grow. If a company cannot reduce emissions faster than they intend on growing, then it must trade to get credits that another company is able to generate via “excess” reductions in their reduction program.

Regards,
The Home Lighting Guy

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.


www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.