brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



CEI Climbs Down on Climate Change

The most outspoken climate-change denying U.S. think tank - recently cut off by favourite funder Exxon Mobil - has coincidentally seen the light on climate science and now acknowledges the obvious.

Check out this excellent overview, reported in The Australian, but written by The New Republic's Bradford Plumer.

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#62343
Carl Szczerski. +0; Tue, 2007-04-10 13:29; Very interesting read, I
Carl Szczerski (not verified)
Very interesting read, I found the last couple paragraphs quite amusing.
#62688
JJ. +0; Wed, 2007-04-11 02:30; You should have Darren blog
JJ (not verified)
You should have Darren blog No Impact Man's appearance on Stephen Colbert: http://blogs.wsj.com/energy/2007/04/10/stephen-colbert-vs-no-impact-man/
#63795
John E. +0; Wed, 2007-04-11 07:18; Good heavens
John E (not verified)
Soooo much slant in that New Republic article... actually quoting the Ellen Goodman "holocaust deniers" link, which further clouds the issues with foolishness... the issue is not whether or not warming is happening -- it's the anthropomorphic part which is in dispute, of course. It cites Gore's Oscar, as if that has any bearing on anything even remotely scientific... this is just irritating noise, nothing helpful to someone like me, who is just out there trying to learn what the deal is. Respected scientists like MIT's Richard Lindzen still have legitimate objections to the CO2-related conclusions being shoved down our collective throats. Saying "the deniers are running scared" is just mindless blather. This is not objective journalism.
#64066
John E. +0; Wed, 2007-04-11 07:55; this is a better example
John E (not verified)
of honest journalism: http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/08/30/mits_inconvenient_scientist/

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
James Hoggan - Black and WhiteClimate Cover-Up Book CoverHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers