Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



CEI Climbs Down on Climate Change

The most outspoken climate-change denying U.S. think tank - recently cut off by favourite funder Exxon Mobil - has coincidentally seen the light on climate science and now acknowledges the obvious.

Check out this excellent overview, reported in The Australian, but written by The New Republic's Bradford Plumer.

What's next?

Good heavens

Soooo much slant in that New Republic article... actually quoting the Ellen Goodman "holocaust deniers" link, which further clouds the issues with foolishness... the issue is not whether or not warming is happening -- it's the anthropomorphic part which is in dispute, of course. It cites Gore's Oscar, as if that has any bearing on anything even remotely scientific... this is just irritating noise, nothing helpful to someone like me, who is just out there trying to learn what the deal is. Respected scientists like MIT's Richard Lindzen still have legitimate objections to the CO2-related conclusions being shoved down our collective throats. Saying "the deniers are running scared" is just mindless blather. This is not objective journalism.

this is a better example

of honest journalism: http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2006/08/30/mits_inconvenient_scientist/

Very interesting read, I

Very interesting read, I found the last couple paragraphs quite amusing.

You should have Darren blog

You should have Darren blog No Impact Man's appearance on Stephen Colbert: http://blogs.wsj.com/energy/2007/04/10/stephen-colbert-vs-no-impact-man/

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers