“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



China gets it: The future belongs to low carbon industries

The international fight on climate change is a contest for economic development space, China’s chief climate negotiator Xie Zhenhua said recently.

Xie, who is also China’s vice-minister for the National Development and Reform commission, said:

Countries with low-carbon industries will have a developmental advantage. Some people believe this is a global competition as significant as the space race in the cold war. ”

This, woefully, is a message lost on Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who is fighting to keep Canada “an emerging energy superpower” devoted to one of the most carbon-intensive energy industries on earth.

Hmmm? I wonder who’s going to come out ahead here?



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's interesting to go to the linked story at Bloomberg.com where it states:

"On Sept. 1, PetroChina Co., China’s largest oil company, bought its first stake in the Canadian oil sands, paying C$1.9 billion ($1.81 billion) for 60 percent of a project run by Athabasca Oil Sands Corp."

If the Chinese are buying into tar sands oil, then they're not really walking the walk of a cleaner, greener energy future, at least not yet. Try as I might to be optimistic, I can't get over the fact that most countries are gobbling up more dirty energy, regardless of what they're saying at Copenhagen.

It could be that most, if not all, countries understand that the future belongs to low-carbon industry. Unfortunately, my guess is that China, like Canada and the US, are not quite ready to start making the transition just yet( at their own peril).

I'm sorry, but ... you're kidding, right? Zhenhua may "get it" but apparently not his country. From the very article you make reference to, another reference:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas

And also, a projection of China's C02 emissions:

http://earthtrends.wri.org/updates/node/110

If you think Zhenhua's message is "woefully" lost on Canada, how about his own country? Judging from China's actions, I doubt they are paying much more than lip service to "The future belongs to low carbon industries."

Careful who you jump into bed with.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.