Breaking: LEAKED final draft of Copenhagen treaty declaration

Fri, 2009-12-18 03:51Brendan DeMelle
Brendan DeMelle's picture

Breaking: LEAKED final draft of Copenhagen treaty declaration

[Update: I’ve added in analysis of the key text]

With only hours left in the Copenhagen climate treaty talks we have obtained an early version of the final agreement’ draft text.

President Obama’s speech wrapped up a few minutes ago with nothing new announced. But as long as this session continues there remains hope that world leaders can deliver a fair, ambitious and legally binding deal.

Things continue to evolve and according to the draft version of the agreement, the major issue of the amount of greenhouse gas emissions cuts by what year, remains unanswered.

As it stands, the text states:

Annex I Parties to the Convention commit to implement, individually or jointly, the quantified economy-wide emission targets for 2020 as listed yielding in aggregate reductions of greenhouse gas emissions of X per cent in 2020 compared to 1990 and Y per cent in 2020 compared to 2005…

Based on the best scientific research these numbers should be 25-40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 and by 80-95 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

One thing to note is that the draft text now includes a mention of a 2005 baseline as well as 1990, which is most likely a bow to pressure by developed countries like the US and Canada who are looking to come out of these negotiations looking better than the actually are by moving the emission reduction goal posts.

Watch to see what these numbers look like in the final signed treaty, as well as the baseline year that is included in the final text.

The other big issue in these negotiations is the transfer of money from developed to developing nations to assist them in moving to a clean energy economy, as well as helping deal with the effects of climate change (i.e. building dikes to protect low-lying land).

On this issue, the draft text states that in the short term:

Parties to provide new and additional resources amounting to 30 billion dollars for the period 2010-2012 as listed and with funding for adaptation prioritized for the most vulnerable developing countries, such as the least developed countries, small island developing states and countries in Africa affected by drought, desertification and floods.

Groups like the Climate Action Network and others have called for a global commitment of US $10 billion annually in the short term (from now to 2013), so this agreement appears to meet the short term financial commitment.

However, on the issue of long-term financing, civil society has been calling for annualized funding to developing nations of US $195 billion globally by 2020. The draft text states:

In the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation, the Parties support a goal of mobilizing jointly 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to address the climate change needs of developing countries.

So a $95 billion shortfall remains between where we should be and where world leaders are willing to go.

‘This declaration won’t save the planet.A so-called politically binding agreement is just a fancy way of saying ‘trust me I’m a politician” says Greenpeace campaigner Joss Garman . “The leaders have just hours left to end this farce but they still can. We need deeper carbon cuts across the board - it’s not complicated - but if they don’t step up now this conference will forever be branded the shame of Copenhagen.”

Unless leaders sit down at the table, roll up their sleeves and get down to business, this leaked draft text will probably closely resemble the final deal here in Copenhagen. And unfortunately, it is not the deal we’ve all been working so hard to see and definitely not the one that will save us from the worst effects of climate change.

Here’s the complete draft text of the final Copenhagen climate treaty: [italics are mine for emphasis]

The Heads of State, Heads of Government, Ministers, and other heads of delegation present at the fifteenth session of the Conference of the Parties and the fifth meeting of the Parties to Conference of the Parties to the to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change,

In pursuit of the ultimate objective of the Convention as stated in its Article 2,

Recalling the provisions of the Convention,

Being guided by Article 3 of the Convention,

Affirming our firm resolve to adopt one or more legal instruments under the Convention pursuant to decisions taken at COP13 and this decision as soon as possible and no later than COP16/CMP6.

Have agreed on this Copenhagen [X] which is operational immediately

1.      The Parties underline that climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time. The Parties emphasise their strong political will to combat climate change in accordance with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities. Recognizing the scientific view that the increase in global temperature ought not to exceed 2 degrees and on the basis of equity and in the context of sustainable development, the Parties commit to a vigorous response through immediate and enhanced national action on mitigation based on strengthened international cooperation.

Ambitious action to mitigate climate change is needed with developed countries taking the lead. The Parties recognize the critical impact of climate change on countries particularly vulnerable to its adverse effects and stress the need to establish a comprehensive adaptation programme including international support.

2.      Deep cuts in global emissions are required. The Parties should cooperate in achieving the peaking of global and national emissions as soon as possible, recognizing that the time frame for peaking will be
longer in developing country Parties and bearing in mind that social and economic development and poverty eradication are the first and overriding priorities of developing country Parties and that low-emission development is indispensible to sustainable development.

3.      Adaptation to the adverse effects of climate change is a challenge faced by all Parties, and enhanced action and international cooperation on adaptation is urgently required to enable and support the implementation of adaptation actions aimed at reducing vulnerability and building resilience in developing country Parties, especially in those that are particularly vulnerable, especially least developed countries, small island developing States and countries in Africa affected by drought, desertification and floods.

The Parties
agree that developed country Parties shall provide adequate, predictable and sustainable financial resources, technology and capacity-building to support the implementation of adaptation action in developing country Parties. The Parties further endorse -/CP.15 on adaptation.

4.      Annex I Parties to the Convention commit to implement, individually or jointly, the quantified economy-wide emission targets for 2020 as listed yielding in aggregate reductions of greenhouse gas emissions of X per cent in 2020 compared to 1990 and Y per cent in 2020 compared to 2005 ensuring that accounting of such targets and finance is rigorous, robust and transparent.

5.      Non-Annex I Parties to the Convention resolve to implement mitigation actions, based on their specific national circumstances and in the context of sustainable development. Mitigation actions taken and envisaged by Non-Annex I Parties shall be reflected through their national communications in accordance with Article 12.1 (b) of the Convention.

The frequency of submissions of the national communications of Non-Annex I Parties shall be every two years.
Mitigation actions taken by Non-Annex I Parties will be subject to their domestic auditing, supervision and assessment, the result of which will be reported through their national communications.

Clarification may, upon request, be provided by the Party concerned at its discretion to respond to any question regarding information contained in the national communications. Nationally appropriate mitigation actions supported and enabled by countries in terms of technology, financing and capacity building, will be registered in a registry, including both action taken and relevant technology, financing and capacity building support.

These supported nationally appropriate mitigation actions shall be subject to international measurement, reporting and verification in accordance with guidelines elaborated by the COP. The Parties take note of the information on enhanced mitigation action actions by Non-Annex I Parties as listed.

6.      Developing countries Parties should, in accordance with the provisions contained in decision /CP.15, contribute to mitigation actions in the forest sector by undertaking the following activities:
reducing emissions from deforestation, reducing emissions from forest degradation, conservation of forest carbon stocks, sustainable management of forest, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.

7.      The Parties decide to pursue various approaches, including opportunities to use markets, to enhance the cost-effectiveness of, and to promote, mitigation actions, in accordance with decision -/CP.15.

8.      Scaled up, new and additional, predictable and adequate funding shall be provided to developing country Parties, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Convention, to enable and support enhanced action on mitigation, including REDD-plus, adaptation, technology development and transfer and capacity-building, for
enhanced implementation of the Convention. Parties take note of the individual pledges by developed country

Parties to provide new and additional resources amounting to 30 billion dollars for the period 2010-2012 as listed and with funding for adaptation prioritized for the most vulnerable developing countries, such as the least developed countries, small island developing states and countries in Africa affected by drought, desertification and floods.

In the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation, the Parties support a goal of mobilizing jointly 100 billion dollars a year by 2020 to address the climate change needs of developing countries. This funding will come from a wide variety of sources, public and private, bilateral and multilateral, including alternative sources of finance.

9.      A High Level Panel will be established under the guidance of and accountable to the Conference of then Parties to assess the contribution of the potential sources of revenue, including alternative sources of finance, towards meeting this goal.

10.     The Parties decide that the Copenhagen Climate Fund shall be established as an operating entity of the financial mechanism of the Convention to support projects, programmes, policies and other activities in developing countries related to mitigation including REDD-plus, adaptation, capacity-building, technology development and transfer as set forth in decision -/CP.15.

11.     In order to enhance action on development and transfer of technology the Parties decide to establish a Technology Mechanism as set forth in decision -/CP.15 to accelerate technology development and transfer in support of action on adaptation and mitigation that will be guided by a country-driven approach and be based on national circumstances and priorities.

12.     The Parties call for a review of this decision and its implementation in 2016 including in light of the Conventions ultimate objective.

13.     Capturing the progress achieved in the work by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action and Ad Hoc Working Group on the Kyoto Protocol under the Convention the Parties by continuing
negotiations pursuant to decisions taken at COP13 and this decision, with a view to adopting one or more legal instruments under the Convention as soon as possible and no later than COP16.

Deciding to extend the mandate of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action under the Convention and continue the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under Kyoto Protocol to negotiate one or more legal instruments under the Convention.

Previous Comments

Seems my earlier comments are deleted. Maybe because I was finding the agreement strange:

“Hilary said they were going to “mobilise” $100b, not donate it. Ask yourselves, why the careful choice of words? Then “by 2020″. So nothing for ten years?”

Is this kicking the can down the road…??

In a few weeks we will see the result of the audit of CRUs temperature “adjustments”. Russia has already said it is not correct.. So, are the Americans just playing it safe with weasel words because they do not want to be standing behind the fan when the you know what hits it over CRU?

One right-wing stink tank in Russia is in lock-step with the same suspect groups and orgs that have been oiled by petro-bucks to amp up the dis-information campaign in North America and Europe.

Check your sources.

One of my comments was deleted yesterday, but I got denials from the folks at this blog. They did allow my follow up … for now.

i.e., back to the stone age, or at least how we lived in the 1600’s.

I have yet to hear from any of you how you propose this actually be achieved. let’s hear it. I’d like to know what you think needs to be done to achieve a 95% reduction in CO2 emissions in Canada, especially since by that time our population would double.

95% is everything. Basically it means that CO2 is a banned gas. I don’t think there is any real plan for how to do that. I guess everything would have to be electric and all electric generation would have to be without CO2. Shipping would have to use sails only, Trains would be electric and Big Trucks would have to be electric (not battery but maybe overhead wires) All private transprtation would be battery powered. Flying has to stop. Windmill farms everywhere.

There are some who say that the green movement has been used(manipulated) to promote nuclear power. If so, I want to thank the green movement!

You can’t honestly think that. Since when have humans regressed in their use technology. And if we can’t agree on the issue of climate change, what about burning less fossil fuels to lower the nasty asthma-inducing pollution. Or how about getting off fossil fuels so we stop contaminating our fresh water supplies?

Are those things regressive as well?

Even if there were some altenative to oil, which there isn’t, it will take a century to rebuild our civilization. Everything is bound to oil. Even your alternatives need oil to be built.

Siphoning billions to give to poor countries is billions we cannot use to change to these alternatives.

But the biggest obsticle to replacing oil is ERoEI. Nothing matches oil. All alternatives have very low, barely break even, net energy. Our entire civilization was built on that net energy.

The first climate refugees took their carbon credits and headed home today. Hugo chavez on behalf of the bolivarian alliance of nations represnting nine countries in central America declared the climate talks a sham and headed home today, treaty unsigned.

Hugo Chavez is a nutcase for sure but in this one instance he sure made the right call. The effects of this for other nations will be felt as mutual trade agreements between other nations and these nine countries will cause unfair economic disadvantages within the region. You can expect members of Opec to start to withdraw from these talks next and then developed nations will begin to leave. For Canada this withdrawl has consequences as venezuela is Canada’s main competitor insofar as oilsands petroleum goes. I can’t see Canada protecting it’s sacred cow and allowing it’s main competitor to be free of restrictions on carbon emissions.

Ironic that one petty dictator has just given citizens of the world so much freedom.

[x]

In less than a decade, climate change-induced sea level rise could force thousands of people to migrate from some small island developing states (SIDS), according to the executive director of the United Nations Environment Program.

The world’s 52 small island developing states (SIDS) increasingly share sea level rise and other escalating environmental threats that are further aggravated by economic insecurities, Achim Steiner added.

What makes this situation even more grievous is that the climate...

read more