Dr. Tim Ball: The Lie that Just Won't Die

Mon, 2007-02-05 16:42Richard Littlemore
Richard Littlemore's picture

Dr. Tim Ball: The Lie that Just Won't Die

The deathless and - in many specific respects - completely fictional meanderings of Dr. Tim Ball have begun appearing again on right-wing blogs all over the net. At City Troll, at Convenient Untruth and at New Orleans Lady, the same tired and retreaded old climate rant paints Dr. Ball as the courageous victim of a plot to silence a well-meaning skeptic.

But Ball can’t even tell the truth about his own resume. His claim to be the first Climatology Ph.D. in Canada is a total falsehood; his degree was in historical geography - not climatology - and it was nowhere near the first ever granted to someone writing vaguely in the field.  It also was granted by the university as a doctor of philosophy, not the more prestigious “doctor of science” that Ball claims in these articles.

UPDATE: to make matters worse, it looks like Ball’s “global warming is good for us” message is running front page in the right-wing uber site, The Drudge Report.

He claims as well to have been a professor (again of climatology) at the University of Winnipeg for 32 years, while he confirmed in his own Statement of Claim in a pending lawsuit (look here ) that he was a professor (of geography, never climatology) for just eight years.

Dr. Ball claims never to have been paid by oil and gas interests, but if you look here , you’ll find a Globe and Mail story in which Dr. Barry Cooper, the man behind Ball’s former industry front group, the Friends of Science , offers this clumsy admission: “[The money’s] not exclusively from the oil and gas industry,” says Prof. Cooper. “It’s also from foundations and individuals. I can’t tell you the names of those companies, or the foundations for that matter, or the individuals.”

Here you’ll find a podcast of Dr. Ball talking to the Ottawa Citizen , saying that he goes out of his way to ignore who might be paying his bills, but crediting the energy industry lobby firm, the High Park Group . And here, you’ll find High Park Group veteran Tom Harris, telling the Toronto Star that his new industry front group, the Natural Resources Stewardship Project , was created at the suggestion of High Park Group president Timothy Egan.

Tom Harris, executive director of the NRSP, is credited by New Orleans Lady for passing along this version of the Ball tirade, also printed Monday on the right-wingy website, Canada Free Press. Yet all of these factual inconsistencies have been brought to Harris’s attention on previous occasions.

It is inevitable that this post will be criticized as an ad hominem attack on dear Dr. Ball (and perhaps on Harris, as well). But how can you argue science with someone who doesn’t feel bound by the limits of truth?

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has just endured an unprecedented process of vetting and peer-review to produce a document, the veracity of which has been double-checked and endorsed by thousands of the best scientists in the world. It must be soul-destroying to see a long-retired geographer who rarely published during his colourless academic career and who never conducted any research in atmospheric science dismiss that effort without a shred of evidence or a hint of good conscience.

Previous Comments

Anonymous

In Russia, global warming denialists like Lord Monckton and the Cato Institute’s Patrick Michaels are invited to deny the scientific facts about global warming on the Kremlin-financed English-language propaganda channel Russia Today.

The Russians launched a propaganda campaign against the British scientists when the EPA made its finding that CO2 was a pollutant. Many denialist organizations quoted this Russian article which originally appeared in Alisher Usmanov’s business daily Kommersant. Usmanov is a Gazprom operative. The article was published in English by the Russian government’s press agency RIA Novosti. As if by magic, many of the organizations that petitioned the EPA about its finding on CO2 cited this Russian article. This was not science; this was Russian propaganda from government and Gazprom sources.

The Russians have the biggest natural gas reserves in the world and they want people to buy their gas instead of developing renewables. Their economy really depends on selling their gas. Gazprom also argues against fracking. They say it is bad for the water, and probably it is. However, really they just say this so they can sell their own gas. Gazprom is not very careful about the Russian environment, so I doubt they really worry about American water.

Hmm… Have you ever visited the Grand Canyon? Climate has been doing a whole lot of changing, even without SUVs… Spins that are tied to taxation seem a bit like something out of the 16th Century when people in Brittain bricked up their windows because of the sun tax!!! Who is lying? and who profits? The greenwash we see nowadays has us putting mercury spirals in our light sockets, but that technology is more toxic than the incandescents.

Perhaps we should stop the money spent on warmongering and tanks, jets, MIlitary Industrial Complex waste etc… Demonizing grandma for driving to the store instead of riding a bike is the depth to which this NWO Gore gang is going…

Lets give Ball a fair hearing… Did you ever hear of Galileo? or Bechamps? Few educated people understand that politics masquerades as science….. yet again.

Pages