brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Deniers "cock a hoop" over latest junk science

Monbiot's column in the Guardian today lays out nicely just how far the climate change deniers are willing to stretch their definition of "sound science." Junk scientists and their cadre of misfits gleefully filled Monbiots inbox with messages like "your scam exposed" and "how do you feel now asshole." Unfortunately, the only scam to expose is the information climate change deniers pawn off as science. The scientific slam-dunk, according to Monbiot, was written by Christopher Monckton, a British aristocrat holding nothing more than a degree in the classics and a diploma in journalism. Check out Monbiot's article, it is well worth the read and very telling of just how desperate the climate change "skeptic" movement is getting.

As usual, a blogging "echo chamber" has erupted, check here for some of the bloggers out there who actually use Monckton for their science:

Climate Audit

The Astute Blogger

Falkayn's Nest

Redstate (this one claims Monckton is a "distinguished scientist."

Acton Institute Blog

Kitchner Conservative

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#11691
Ian Forrester. +1; Wed, 2006-11-15 10:13; Monckton's response
Monckton has a response to George Monbiot's article. For some reason I cannot add a comment to it on the online Guardian so I will place it here. "So Christopher Monckton, you are correct in everything you say? Well perhaps you should read the NAS report on the Mann papers. This report, written by scientists working in the field of climate science essentially agreed with everything written by Mann et al. Instead, you chose to believe pseudo-science written by two non-scientists who are working on an agenda not undertaking research as it is supposed to be conducted. Shame on you". Ian Forrester
#11693
Kevin Grandia. +1; Wed, 2006-11-15 10:20; Nice
We're actually having dinner with Monbiot tonight. I willl give him a pat on the back for you Ian.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Hoggan, Robertson, HarcourtClimate Cover-Up Book CoverJames Hoggan - ColourRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers