Jones dissects Durkin
Read more: Jones dissects Durkin
For those of the paper-print orientation, attached is a transcription of the ABC Australia's Tony Jones interview with "Great Global Warming Swindle" director, Martin Durkin.
Probably a good idea to store this one away. You never know when YouTube will pull down the videos.
Thanks to our anonymous friend in the UK for sending this on to us. Fabulous!
Results so far on our "Great Global Warming Swindle" straw poll on favorite part from the ABC Australia's Tony Jones interview with director Martin Durkin:
20% like "Everyone is Wrong But Durkin"
22% like "Climate Scientists Don't Even Understand the Basics"
10% like "Dude What's Up With Your Graph"
25% like "Oh, I Forgot My Graph Was 25 Years Old!"
22% like "No Flaws, No Flaws, No Flaw"
Click here to read more and add your vote!
UPDATE: readers have emailed telling us that "Tony Jones Dissects" is incorrect. They suggest instead "Tony Jones massacres any shred of credibility Durkin may have had left. It's a total train-wreck."
Here you go. The Tony Jones interview of Global Warming Swindle producer, Martin Durkin.
Below is Part 1. Click here for Part 2.
The Swindle is a one-sided anti-global warming argument put together by a film maker with a name for skewing the facts, and featuring greenhouse skeptics with media profiles that far exceed their scientific publishing records."
- ABC Online Science writer, Bernie Hobbs
A new little button titled "The Great Global Warming Swindle SWINDLE" has just been added on ABC Australia's dedicated "Great Global Warming Swindle" webpage.
The new section absolutely trashes Martin Durkin's "Great Global Warming Swindle" film.
Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.
There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.