brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Donate to Operation Uncover DSCOVR - we need your help!

Step up DeSmogBlog fans. We need your help in finding out who killed the Deep Space Observatory project.

The more donations we receive the more resources we can throw behind this project. We have an opportunity to shine the light on the politics behind global warming at their worst. Click here to donate, it all adds up, so whatever you can afford.

And here's the cheeky DSCOVR "advertisement" we are sending around the blog-o-sphere. Enjoy!

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#115622
john. +0; Thu, 2007-08-30 06:23; I'm sold...and the Ukraine
john (not verified)

I'm sold...and the Ukraine offered to launch it for free? What are the operating costs?

#115644
Kevin Grandia. +1; Thu, 2007-08-30 09:28; Generally affordable

A few mill to launch, but hey, only about $25,000 for us to research the heck out of this thing, pressure congress and others to pay for it themselves!

#115754
Paul S. +0; Thu, 2007-08-30 22:50; Can't they just crush the
Paul S (not verified)

Can't they just crush the satellite? I've heard prices for scrap metal are pretty good nowadays. ;)

#115801
Kevin Grandia. +1; Fri, 2007-08-31 07:35; It's kinda little

It's a really small satellite - only stand about 10 ft. high. Probably not worth much as scrap. Better to send it to space.

#115829
Paul S. +0; Fri, 2007-08-31 10:02; Visiting the NASA site, it
Paul S (not verified)

Visiting the NASA site, it says the satellite's status is TBD, to be determined. It probably will be launched sometime in the future.

#115834
Kevin Grandia. +1; Fri, 2007-08-31 10:19; Not at this rate

5 years in a box at $1 million a year in storage costs and no sign yet. I think the current administration would like this to slip quietly into the night. 

#115858
Paul S. +0; Fri, 2007-08-31 14:02; It will probably be launched
Paul S (not verified)

It will probably be launched at some time Kevin.

After the loss of the shuttle Columbia, NASA also said they would never send another shuttle to the Hubble telescope either. Even though there was $250 million dollars worth of parts to repair and upgrade the telescope, it was decided to let the Hubble fade away.

Now, several years later, NASA has decided to send one more mission to the Hubble in September 2008. So I wouldn't give up hope on the DSCOVR craft yet; it's time will probably still come.

Regards,

#115996
Anna Haynes. +0; Sat, 2007-09-01 12:29; URL for all Uncover DSCOVR posts?
Anna Haynes (not verified)

Drupal allows Categories, right? Will there be a single URL I can use to view all "Operation Uncover DSCOVR" DeSmogBlog posts?

#116222
rob. +0; Sun, 2007-09-02 13:24; Pass the collection plate
rob (not verified)

So a slick Vancouver PR firm is soliciting charitable donations for itself.

Nice.

And what is the worthy cause? To "pressure" congress to launch a satellite (spewing tons and tons of evil greenhouse gasses in the process). I wonder if it has ocurred to them how likely a foreign government will care about what a Vancouver PR company has to say.

Oh, sure. It all sounds pretty far-fetched, but never mind that. This is no time for doubt, people! That's just playiing right into the hands of the Deniaralist Conspiracy. Just send money. Operators are standing by.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
James Hoggan - ColourHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtJames Hoggan - Black and WhiteRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers