Eat less meat to fight climate change, IPCC chief says

Wed, 2008-01-16 10:04Bill Miller
Bill Miller's picture

Eat less meat to fight climate change, IPCC chief says

Individual lifestyle choices can play a key role in reducing the output of carbon dioxide and other gases generated by human activity that are driving global warming, says the head of the UN’s Nobel Prize-winning scientific panel on climate change.

So instead of simply waiting for governments to take action, individuals can do their part by cutting meat consumption, walking more and buying less.

Rajendra Pachauri an Indian economist and a vegetarian, said the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) highlights “the importance of lifestyle changes,” and the need for people around the world to curb their carnivorous appetites.

Studies have shown producing 2.2 pounds of meat causes the emissions equivalent of 80 pounds of carbon dioxide, Pachauri told a press conference. In addition, raising and transporting that slab of beef, lamb or pork requires the same energy as lighting a 100-watt bulb for three weeks.

“Please eat less meat,” he said, “meat is a very carbon intensive commodity.”

He also advocated cycling or walking “instead of jumping in a car to go 500 metres,” and urged consumers to purchase only what they really need instead of buying something “just because it’s there.”

If you like this story, please consider voting for it on Digg.com by clicking here.

Comments

“He also advocated cycling or walking “instead of jumping in a car to go 500 metres,” and urged consumers to purchase only what they really need instead of buying something “just because it’s there.”

Sure – unless you happen to be a concerned environmental activist:

In which case you can jet on over to Barcelona, and sip a fine Merlot while Al Gore reinforces your delusions of moral superiority. http://www.climatechangeandwine.com/eng/index.php

My name is Hannah I come from Southampton in the south of England. I’ve just recently stopped eating meat because of the energy used when keeping livestock and when producing the meat itself. Its not only an issue of climate change for me, its the huge amounts of land needed to house livestock- it could be used to produce a larger amount of grains and other plants.

[x]
High-speed train

Aggressively tackling global warming through better public transportation and increased energy efficiencies could increase global GDP by between $1.8 trillion and $2.6 trillion annually, a new report has found.

Released on Monday, the report by the World Bank and the ClimateWorks Foundation said tackling global warming now would also save as many as 94,000 lives a year from pollution-related diseases and reduce crop losses.

The report —...

read more