Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



EU credibility on climate-change fight at stake; UK’s Blair calls for leadership

Two targets are on the table at the contentious summit on environmental issues – that by 2020 sources such as solar and wind power should account for 20 percent of EU consumption, and that biofuels should make up 10 percent – but whether to set the goals in concrete is a source of deep friction between member states.

With EU leaders meeting March 8, the commission has put its political cards on the table and called for national governments to do the same.

"From Moscow to Washington, they will be watching us to see if we are really credible," said commission president Jose Manuel Barroso. "It is much more credible to have a binding target than an indicative target."

Some member states -- France and several central and eastern European countries -- are opposed to mandatory targets. Paris is seen as key for an agreement, but its compromise of higher targets on low-carbon energy while including nuclear energy is opposed by non-nuclear countries like Ireland and Austria.

Mr Barroso said EU member states should commit to cutting greenhouse emissions by 20 percent by 2020, rising to 30 percent if other developed countries come on board.

What's next?

ak074970355 http://milfxxxpass.com//#0 - milf porn milf seeker [URL=http://milfxxxpass.com//#2] milf sex [/URL] [http://milfxxxpass.com//#3 milf hunter] [link]http://milfxxxpass.com//#4 [/link]

20% ?

Just a question Bill ... if you have the information.

20% from what base-line? Now? 2012? 1990? (i.e. Kyoto base)?

oops...

Rereading, I now see that the target is a 20% share of the power generation in 2020.

1990

All the European targets I've seen use 1990.

Actually, the Germans (they've got the EU presidency right now) are going to push for mandatory 60%-80% cuts by 2050.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers