brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Even Big Coal finds CEI ad offensive

The coal barons who control the National Rural Cooperative Electric Association have fallen out with the climate quibblers at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) over the think tank's most recent round of ads that challenge the fight against global warming.

Rural electric co-ops are populated overwhelmingly by companies running coal-fired electrical plants and in the past, they were more likely to be part of the problem when it came to climate change disinformation. But now they're trying to rein in CEI - still something of a laughingstock for its earlier "We Call if Life " ad campaign.

Likely as not, this dispute arose because of copyright challenges that the NRCEA itself faces for using footage of Nobel laureate Al Gore without permission. But in a civilized world, you would have thought that the coal kings and CEI would have settled the issue quietly, as between friends.

Increasingly, it appears, CEI doesn't have any friends.

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#224862
xenu. +0; Wed, 2008-03-26 18:47; Coal Barons?
xenu (not verified)

"Coal barons"? "Big coal"?

Don't be ridiculous, Richard.

The rural cooperatives are heavily subsidised by money from the US federal government.

#225507
Richard Littlemore. +1; Thu, 2008-03-27 06:57; Not Coal Barons?

I'm happy to admit that electrical cooperatives are outside the (admittedly narrow) scope of my expertise. But as any number of energy majors (or auto manufacturers) know, you don't have to be impoverished to get a federal subsidy these days. Increasingly, it seems that being impoverished is actually a disadvantage.

In any case, according to this link, the NRCEA's members control $100 billion in assets and bring power to 40 million people in 47 states. Of the 3,150  member organizations,  2,000 are publicly owned,  930 are actually co-ops and 220 are "investor owned."

Looking closer, you see that the publicly owned and co-op members control around one-quarter of the whole operation, while the minority investor-owned utilities control three quarters. These may not be coal barons in the Peabody tradition, but there would be some pretty affluent baronettes in the crowd.

I suspect there are many lovely folks in the NRCEA - that a company like the Kansas coal promoting Sunflower Electric is not necessarily representative of the whole organization - but I think there is a compelling argument to be made that they are "big" and that they are up to the very brim of their waders in carboniferous black rock.

 

#226369
rob. +0; Thu, 2008-03-27 18:59; Nice scenic detour, Richard
rob (not verified)

"but I think there is a compelling argument to be made"

So when are you going to make it? Thus far, you haven't.

" that they are "big""

Big, small, medium-sized ... and that's relevant, how? Would you have us believe power utilities are run on a mom-and-pop business scale? Or that they should be? What exactly is your "area of expertise", as none seems to be in evidence here?

" and that they are up to the very brim of their waders in carboniferous black rock."

And that has what, exactly, to do with the fact that they are heavily subsidised by the government?

#226374
rob. +0; Thu, 2008-03-27 19:03; P.S. -- WTF?
rob (not verified)

But all that aside, at what point to power utilities, which might consume coal become interchangeable with your imaginary "coal barons" -- which presumably produce coal?

You seem a little confused on the distinction.

#227053
Richard Littlemore. +1; Fri, 2008-03-28 05:37; Excellent distinction

Thanks for that Rob. It hadn't occurred to me that there might be no connection whatever between the people who produce coal and the people who buy coal and use it to make money - I mean, electricity.

It must be so hard to keep your brain organized, sealing off those little compartments so effectively against the influx of information that a less disciplined person might have found to be overlapping. 

#227975
rob. +0; Fri, 2008-03-28 19:52; Keep digging, Little-more.
rob (not verified)

THAT'S the best argument you can come up with to defend your statement?! Truly laughable.

It may also not have occurred to you that the word "distinction" does not mean the same as "connection".

So, using your "logic", if your computer uses the Windows operating system, that must necessarily mean you are a toady for Bill Gates and his aspirations.

Christ, at least I have a brain to keep organised ...

#228845
Stephen Berg. +1; Sat, 2008-03-29 09:27; Using your "logic", Rob, one

Using your "logic", Rob, one would conclude that there is insufficient evidence to prove that gravity is a force on this planet or that this planet is not flat.

#224980
Richard Pauli. +0; Wed, 2008-03-26 21:39; Links?
Richard Pauli (not verified)

Those videos are difficult to find. Got any links?

#225509
Richard Littlemore. +1; Thu, 2008-03-27 07:00; Dead links everywhere ...

Sorry not to have check them when I posted, but you're quite right, the ads seem to have disappeared into the ether. You'd almost think that CEI was no longer proud of its work ...

#225918
Kevin Grandia. +1; Thu, 2008-03-27 13:04; Links to the ads
Here's a link to one of them at least: http://blip.tv/file/743760/

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Climate Cover-Up Book CoverJames Hoggan - ColourRichard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - Black and White

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers