brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



eXXon caught with fingers crossed, new report

Despite ExxonMobil's denials, a report released today by Greenpeace's ExxonSecrets.org project, reveals that the largest oil company in the world continues to spend millions on a stealth public relations campaign aimed at discrediting global warming science.

According to the report, Exxon provided $2.1 million in 2006 to 41 "think" tanks and associations that actively sow doubt about the realities of climate change. Since 1998, ExxonMobil has spent a staggering $23 million on this climate disinformation.

ExxonSecret's report titled: ExxonMobil's Continued Funding of Global Warming Denial Industry (attached), will easily withstand criticism by those who want to dismiss this as a conspiracy theory. Check out the 1998 communications plan (in the attached report, Denial and Deception) outlining the beginnings of the entire undertaking by Exxon-funded organizations.

While the ExxonMobil climate change confusion campaign continues, the company has recently come under heavy-fire from members of the scientific community and US legislators. In September, 2006, the prestigious London Royal Society sent a letter (pdf) to ExxonMobil urging them to discontinue such activities. The letter states:

At our meeting in July, I also told you of my concerns about the support ExxonMobil has been giving to organisations that have been misinforming the public about the science of climate change. You indicated that ExxonMobil would not be providing any further funding to these organisations."

In January of this year the Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report titled, Smoke, Mirrors and Hot Air: How ExxonMobil uses Big Tobacco tactics to manufacture uncertainty on climate science.(pdf version here)

In October, 2006 U.S. Senators Rockefeller and Snowe sent a letter to Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson stating:

We are convinced that ExxonMobil's longstanding support of a small cadre of global climate change skeptics, and those skeptics' access to and influence on government policymakers, have made it increasingly difficult for the United States to demonstrate the moral clarity it needs across all facets of its diplomacy."

Since then, Exxon has tried to soften its hard-line stance on global warming. The Wall Street Journal reported in January, 2007 that:

... Exxon decided in late 2005 not to fund for 2006 Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) and 'five or six' other groups active in the global warming debate."

The ExxonSecret report shows those groups are presumably the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Environmental Literacy Council, Free Enterprise Education Institute the Center for a New Europe USA and the Center for Defense of Free Enterprise.

At the DAVOS Conference this year Forbes Magazine said of CEO Rex Tillerson that:

On carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and their impact on global warming he [Rex Tillerson] said: 'It is clear that something is going on. It is not useful to debate the issue any longer."

The report out today proves what DSBlog and many others have long suspected: Exxon is happy to spin this issue, but not act in good faith. The company says that it believes humans are causing climate change, but still doesn't want you to believe it.Exxon says that it believes humans are causing climate change, but the company still doesn't want you to believe it.

ExxonMobil is the richest company in the history of companies, yet it can't seem to find the money to diversify its operations away from full fossil-fuel dependency. It's no wonder they don't want people to embrace sensible (and affordable) climate change policy.

While still a difficult issue, scientists are telling us that it can be beat with existing technology and minimal investment.

The first step is a well-informed - and honest - public debate about what we need to do to significantly reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.

On the honest part, especially, Exxon is not helping.

AttachmentSize
ExxonSecrets 2007 Analysis.pdf259.89 KB
Exxon, Denial and Deception.pdf206.53 KB
What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#89086
Tony. +0; Thu, 2007-05-17 21:13; Good catch, and thanks for
Tony (not verified)
Good catch, and thanks for the links. I guess I know what I'll be reading over the weekend...
#89149
Hugh Campbell. +1; Fri, 2007-05-18 00:49; Stanford bucks
Speaking of Exxon: "Concerned Stanford University alumni have succeeded in getting the Stanford Board of Trustee's Advisory Panel on Investment Responsibility (APIR) to support a shareholder resolution pressuring Exxon Mobil to take immediate steps to reduce the giant oil company's contributions to global warming. The move by Stanford is notable since Exxon Mobil routinely cites its support for the Stanford Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) as a major reason for why it does not need to take short-term action on global warming."

Full story at http://sev.prnewswire.com/oil-energy/20070517/DCTH03517052007-1.html

#89254
Kevin Grandia. +1; Fri, 2007-05-18 05:57; thanks
I have heard a lot of people waving the Stanford project around as Exxon's committment to climate change, but until they stop funding the misinformation campaign, Exxon will remain on the wrong side of this issue.
#141744
Letha Davis. +0; Tue, 2007-12-18 23:25; Ingrid Rhodes
Letha Davis (not verified)

memoried soumansite calciphobous reactance demophon unissuable stomacher outmagic
J.J. Daly Company - Inventory Management
http://cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/02/15/retail.e.ditch.idg/index.html

#193529
Darell Hensley. +0; Thu, 2008-02-21 06:22; Monte Dejesus
Darell Hensley (not verified)

anticreeping wraithe randomwise unsolaced cymaphytic yohimbi esophagocele sulciform
Proform 500 Elliptical
http://13d.cfntcoaa.net/
Custom Vue Lasik Custom Advertising
http://sv.utmfww.net/
Southwest Airlines Future
http://2el.utmfww.net/

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Climate Cover-Up Book CoverHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtRichard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - Colour

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers