Faked Climate Graph Used in German Schools
It's frightening how easy it is to present a computer-assisted lie, especially if you have no conscience about faking things like climate reconstruction graphs. It's also frightening that such a piece of fakery can find its way into the school system of a G8 country.
This graph was created by a German high school teacher named E.G. Beck. It's based on information that is more out of date than a Tim Patterson solar forcing graph, and is manipulated to specifically misrepresent both the scale and the recent climate curve.
RealClimate has the whole story.
Hey, when I saw the heading
Why is that?
This cut and paste fakery
This cut and paste fakery involved phony temperature scales
Zog, if you are calling Mann
if you are clling Mann
To borrow an old line,,,,
Perhaps you should wander on over to realclimate.org, where you’ll see evidence of Beck’s fraudulent activities that is so obvious that a 6th-grader could understand it. (That doesn’t mean that your average global-warming denier will necessarily comprehend it, though).
Yeah, my high-school German
Yeah, my high-school German teacher taught us the German idiom equating Spanish to something incomprehensible to them.
( homeschool and online ged test )
It is almost as if they are
It is almost as if they are shouting “look what the education system did for me, I have learned nothing but I am going to pretend that I know all and I’m proud of it”. teletext holidays - lanzarote weather - waterless cookware - calphalon nonstick
Oh, The Humanity!
Or...
Kind of like James Keegstra
See?
This cut and paste fakery
It is almost as if they are shouting “look what the education system did for me, I have learned nothing but I am going to pretend that I know all and I’m proud of it”.
bottom line
Freud
truth of the bard
“The simple minded
And the uninformed
Can be easily led astray.
And those that cannot connect the dots,
Hey, look the other way.
People believe what they want to believe
When it makes no sense at all…”
“Words and Music” album.
Vote for Change Tour, 2004.
Dude, you just, like, blew my mind!
help for you
Like, Wow ...
Wouldn't it make more sense
Wouldn’t it make more sense to put the graphs on a map?
To discover that most languages refer to chinese as something they don’t understand could have been easily made from a simple table too.
and once again about German:
As we’re talking about languages, and relating one language to another in terms of not understanding, the german “Bahnhof” doesn’t really make any sense, although it does say (nearly) the same thing. It’s spanish what we’re looking for.
Fake Films Too
Not that you would know
Those who know the least think they know a lot
I always find it ironic that those people who show by their posts that they know nothing about science are always the ones who claim to know what should be taught in school science classes.
There is a disturbing anti-science sentiment in those posts. In fact it is more than anti-science it is also anti-intellectual. It is almost as if they are shouting "look what the education system did for me, I have learned nothing but I am going to pretend that I know all and I'm proud of it".
It just goes to prove the old saying "empty barrels make the most noise"
Ian Forrester
Thoes who know the least
Go ahead, it will be a short post
In case you haven't read it, the majority of climate scientists are of the opinion that Gore just about got everything right. Could have done with a bit more explanation in a couple of cases, but he was correct in almost everything in the documentary.
Go ahead and tell us what you have been told by the AGW deniers that is wrong with the movie. It will be a short post or it will be full of misinformation. From previous posts of yours I'm going with the latter.
Ian Forrester
Reference?
How do you know a “majority” of climate scientists agree with Gore? Did they take a vote?
Please share with us your evidence for that claim.
Review by a real climate
Review by a real climate scientist, endorsed by other real climate scientists.
"...How well does the film handle the science? Admirably, I thought. It is remarkably up to date, with reference to some of the very latest research. Discussion of recent changes in Antarctica and Greenland are expertly laid out. He also does a very good job in talking about the relationship between sea surface temperature and hurricane intensity. As one might expect, he uses the Katrina disaster to underscore the point that climate change may have serious impacts on society, but he doesn't highlight the connection any more than is appropriate (see our post on this, here)..."
"...For the most part, I think Gore gets the science right, just as he did in Earth in the Balance..."
You Didn't Answer The Question
The question is too stupid
"The question is too
That's AGW cultists.
That's AGW cultists.
VJ bursts into tears and runs away...again.
In answer to my question:
How do you know a “majority” of climate scientists agree with Gore? Did they take a vote?
“VJ” replied:
“The question is too stupid to deserve an answer.”
So, in other words, you are (yet again) unable to substantiate your claims.
Eco-Zog is right
Eco-Zog is of course
Okay ...
So you still can’t answer the question?
How, exactly, do you know the “majority” of climate scientists agree with Gore?
It’s really a very simple question. Why so evasive?
So although there hasn't
Virtually no scientists who have published in peer-reviewed climatology journals in the past decade have complained about Gore.
Gore was *very* well received when he spoke to an overflow crowd of scientists at the American Geophysical Union (AGU) conference last December. The AGU, btw, is the USA’s largest and most influential professional association of Earth and climate scientists.
The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, one of the world’s foremost oceanographic and climatology research centers, has publicly thrown its support behind Gore’s movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”. (See http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu/Releases/?releaseID=734 for details)
The only people who have complained about Gore’s movie are incompetent and/or dishonest hacks who haven’t conducted any legitimate climate-science research this century.
"The only people who have
"The only people who have complained about Gore's movie are incompetent and/or dishonest hacks who haven't conducted any legitimate climate-science research this century."
AMEN!!!
Eco-Zog has been outvoted
Bingo ! VJ uses the "v"
Yawn.
decision
Go Ahead
Do a re-write and I'll answer your questions
There are too many simple mistakes in your writing skills to even attempt to answer your questions as written.
Just goes to prove that your lack of scientific understanding is probably caused by an equally poor understanding of English comprehension and expression skills.
Ian Forrester
Thank you Mr Forrester
Your question is undecipherable
"20 to 23 sea rise", and other various meaningless words.
Your atrocious grammar and nonsensical writing show that you have absolutely no respect for anyone reading your comments.
Until you improve your writing I will not be answering your questions.
If you really want an answer then do a bit of reading in reputable sources.
Ian Forrester
Facts
Error
furniture
furniture liquidators
refurbished cubicles
Dear "Intellectual" ...
” … I am going to pretend that I know all and I’m proud of it”.
Remind us again exactly which of us smuggly claims to be in possession of The [Inconvenient] Truth? I’m pretty sure it’s not me, nor any of your other ideological enemies.
Once you’ve figured that out, be sure to resume your pompous braying, so we can laugh all the more.
Empty barrel rattling again
Just proved my point EH.
Ian Forrester