Harry Reid to Hillary Clinton: Drop Keystone XL Pipeline Plan

Sat, 2011-10-22 22:14Farron Cousins
Farron Cousins's picture

Harry Reid to Hillary Clinton: Drop Keystone XL Pipeline Plan

Opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline have gained a new ally in the fight to prevent this disastrous oil boondoggle from moving forward: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D–NV).

Earlier this month, Sen. Reid sent a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urging her to abandon the pipeline and instead focus on renewable energy. The Washington Post provided an excerpt of Reid’s letter to Clinton:

The proponents of this pipeline would be wiser to invest instead in job-creating clean energy projects, like renewable power, energy efficiency or advanced vehicles and fuels that would employ thousands of people in the United States rather than increasing our dependency on unsustainable supplies of dirty and polluting oil that could easily be exported.

This is the first time that Reid has publicly addressed the Keystone XL issue, and that signals a very powerful friend to the opponents of the pipeline. Already, some labor unions and Democratic lawmakers have thrown their support in favor of the pipeline, maintaining that the project would create much-needed jobs, despite evidence to the contrary.

Earlier this month, Congressman Henry Waxman (D–CA) called on the House Energy and Commerce Committee to investigate the Koch brothers' interests in the Keystone XL pipeline, as the majority of the members on the Energy Committee have received campaign contributions from Koch Industries and its employees.


The fact that Reid chose to single out Clinton on the issue shows that he is paying attention to the issue very closely. DeSmogBlog has put together some excellent pieces detailing Clinton’s ties to the lobbyists pushing the pipeline.

Reid is one of the few Democrats in Congress, along with Waxman, to speak out against the pipeline. Other Congressional Democrats have actually written a letter to the President, urging him to grant an immediate Presidential Permit to get the pipeline in production. That letter pleased TransCanada so much that it provides a link to it on the TransCanada website.


The next several months will bring more heated discussion about the wisdom of building another pipeline to feed our global oil addiction. Why is it that nobody seems to be paying much attention to the job-creating clean energy projects that Harry Reid and countless others are pressing Congress and President Obama to deliver?

Previous Comments

Why stop with just a conflict of interest with the pipeline? Investigate every conflict of interest.

 

Politics is mostly the short game. Youve got to do whats reasonably popular and youve got to improve the economy now. It’s hard to do long term payoff stuff like renewable energy in any great quantity. The more immediate pay off of a pipeline is going to win the day.

The Keystone pipeline is a big plus for all those concerned. The US has a choice either take the pipeline and the jobs and wealth that come with it. Alternatively let Canada or China upgrade the resources and sell it back to the US.

Only a fool thinks that anyone will leave Oil in the ground, global warming or cooling. The money is what will matter.

 

Bulldozers & backhoes already on the way…

[x]

Back in August, DeSmog reported on California environmentalists stopping “stealth carbon bombs” in their communities. Now they're celebrating another victory as a dangerous—and illegal—crude oil transport project in Sacramento has been halted as well.

According to a report by the Sacramento Bee last March, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District first...

read more