Heartland Debate Challenge Update, April 11, 2007

Wed, 2007-04-11 18:01Kevin Grandia
Kevin Grandia's picture

Heartland Debate Challenge Update, April 11, 2007

DeSmog Debate Challenge

Still haven't heard from them. In the meantime, please enjoy some past posts we have done on the Heartland Institute or the entry for Heartland over at Sourcewatch.

Previous Comments

Sorry for the delay. Before we can discuss a debate on smoking, you need to retract an inaccurate statement you make in your original post on the subject. The article you cited as presenting “Heartland’s position on the record” on smoking is not a statement of Heartland’s position at all. It is from an article that appeared in a 2004 issue of Chronicles magazine, and is a tongue-in-cheek account of the young writer’s decision to start smoking. It’s on Heartland’s web site as one of more than 18,000 documents from 350 different groups posted on PolicyBot, our clearinghouse for public policy research. My views (and those of Maureen Martin, our senior fellow for legal affairs) are readily available on Heartland’s Web site.
[x]

Would UKIP be riding so high if voters knew of the party's links with powerful right-wing US corporate interests promoting fossil fuels, denying climate change, opposing gun control, and supporting big tobacco, teaching creationism in schools, healthcare privatisation and the lifting of nuclear power regulation? Alex Stevenson and Oliver Tickell of The Ecologist investigate.

UKIP's big-picture goal is a bid to achieve independence from the European Union - but in backing...

read more