Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Insurance giant says natural disasters becoming more frequent

The number of natural disasters in the United States (pdf) has more than doubled since 1980 according to a new report released by Munich Re, one of the largest reinsurance companies in the world.

This graph says it all:

 

(Click image to enlarge)
 
The total number of disasters as of June 30, 2008 already exceeds the average number of disasters recorded at mid-year over the past decade. Although 2008 is not on pace to eclipse 2007 as registering the most natural disasters ever, an especially active Atlantic hurricane season is expected.

Natural Disasters and Climate Change

While climate change cannot be linked to any individual weather event, it is widely accepted that warmer temperatures associated with climate change cause more extreme weather. "The year is following the long-term trend towards more weather catastrophes, which is influenced by climate change," said Torsten Jeworrek, a Munich Re board member.

On climate change and natural disasters Joe Romm at Climate Progress recently wrote that:

"... the tornados and floods battering the country with almost unimaginable severity are the early tantrums of an angry planet. Under this reading, this season of natural disasters shows that climate change has arrived ahead of schedule, much to the disappointment of those who hoped that fire, drought, violent weather and the other predicted impacts of global warming were a problem only for future generations."

In last year's final report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world's top climate scientists concluded (pdf.) that human influences have:

- very likely contributed to sea level rise during the latter half of the 20th century.

- likely contributed to changes in wind patters, affecting extra-tropical storm tracks and temperature patterns.

- likely increased temperatures of extreme hot nights, cold nights and cold days.

- more likely than not increased rick of heat waves, area affected by drought since the 1970's and frequency of heavy precipitation events.

The IPCC scientists use a "liklihood scale" when drawing conclusions in their reports:

Virtually likely means more than 99% probability of occurence.

Very likely means more than 90% probability

Likely means more than 66% probability

About as likely as not means 33 to 66% probability

Unlikely means less than 33% probability

What's next?

Under this reading, this

Under this reading, this season of natural disasters shows that climate change has arrived ahead of schedule, much to the disappointment of those who hoped that fire, drought, violent weather and the other predicted impacts of global warming were a problem only for future generations.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------

health quotes | health insurance quotes

See also Swiss Re, they've

See also Swiss Re, they've been on this for a long time.
http://www.swissre.com/pws/about%20us/knowledge_expertise/top%20topics/climate%20change/climate%20change.html

I posted once before in

I posted once before in regards to climate change bringing about more extreme weather events. It is afterall one of those predicted outcomes of climate change/global warming. A greater energy imbalance within the system is going to lead to more powerful weather events. Not surprised at all to see this. Do you know of how this differs from more northern countries or southern? I recall reading model predictions for greater relative stability in the tropics and less relative weather stability in the more temperate climates. Anyone know?

Soft Drink Giant Says We're Not Buying Enough Delicious Pepsi

When it comes objective data, if you can't trust an insurance company, who can you trust? After all, it's not like they make money on this by selling insurance.

Uh, oh, wait a second ...

A nice deconstruction of Munich Re's hysteria mongering:

Cashing in on calamity

http://tinyurl.com/64mzwx

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers