It Takes More than Dead Trees to Make a Credible Newspaper

authordefault
on

An article in last week’s British paper, The Telegraph, claimed that the IPCC had made yet another significant mistake – this time overstating the sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest to drought.  It turns out that the article severely misrepresented the state of the science. While that one very dry year did not produce the kind of vegetation changes detectible by satellite imagery, it did, in fact, kill a number of trees, turning the rainforest from a “sink” that absorbed 2 billion tons of CO2, to a “source” of even more CO2 from the resulting number of dead trees. The culpa for an initial post to Desmogblog, taking the IPCC to task, is exclusively mea.  The correct narrative of the rainforest’s vulnerability to severe drought comes courtesy of the scientists at Realclimate.

Related Posts

on

Internal documents expose how oil and gas majors were given the chance to influence a report by the Policy Exchange think tank.

Internal documents expose how oil and gas majors were given the chance to influence a report by the Policy Exchange think tank.
on

F Minus research reveals CO fossil fuel lobbying firms continually fought for and against environmental regulations.

F Minus research reveals CO fossil fuel lobbying firms continually fought for and against environmental regulations.
Analysis
on

Facts aren't enough to combat false and misleading messaging. Experts suggest an additional strategy.

Facts aren't enough to combat false and misleading messaging. Experts suggest an additional strategy.
Series: Gaslit
Series: Gaslit
on

Federal tax data reveals the Canadian journalist spent 10 years at the Aurea Foundation, a top funder of think tanks that argue the climate crisis isn’t real.

Federal tax data reveals the Canadian journalist spent 10 years at the Aurea Foundation, a top funder of think tanks that argue the climate crisis isn’t real.