John Droz Jr.
John received undergraduate degrees in Physics and Mathematics from Boston College, and a graduate degree in Physics from Syracuse University. 
He retired at age 34 after a successful career in real estate investing, but has also worked for GE: Aerospace Electronics (Utica, NY), Mohawk Data Sciences (Herkimer, NY), and Monolithic Memories (Cupertino, CA).
In 2011 he became a member of the Board of Directors and scientific advisor to NC-20, an advocacy group that has been outspoken against restrictions on coastal development.
Droz also runs the website “Wind Power Facts” which asserts that mainstream information about wind power is distributed primarily by industry lobbyists while the “real science” indicates that we should abandon wind power as a source of energy.
Stance on Climate Change
“Is Global Warming a scientifically resolved matter? No. There is some very convincing evidence (and scientists) that indicate that there is such a thing as Global Warming. But
there are some very qualified scientists (with good evidence) that suggest just the opposite.
More importantly, statements often appearing in the media like 'the majority of scientists' believe in Global Warming, are meaningless. First of all, no legitimate survey has ever been
done, and secondly, science is not about the number of people who advocate a position.” 
“When I first heard about wind energy I was a supporter. Quite frankly, I never linked the looks of turbines but felt that we would have to live with the unsightliness as a trade-off for the good I initially assumed they were doing. Then I did some research and Critical Thinking. My conclusion now (as a scientist, economist, and environmentalist) is that industrial Wind Energy is not based on sound science.” 
“A critical fact to understand is that just because a power source is an alternative, or a renewable, does NOT automatically mean that it is better than any conventional or fossil fuel source!” 
“90% of my time is spent on science. My focus is to try to educate citizens. Citizens could care less whether I have a peer-reviewed article.” 
February 3, 2013
John Droz delivered a presentation titled “Science Under Assault” which suggests that modern climate science is being threatened by environmentalists, educators and the media. He highlights articles that claim environmentalism is a “new religion” with a primary goal to “undermine the authority of science,” and that mainstream climate science is based on “fiction.”
Facing South notes that Droz cites a number of less-than-credible sources:
“sources like WorldNetDaily, a website that promotes conspiracy theories about topics such as President Obama's citizenship; Quadrant, a conservative Australian magazine that was involved in a scandal over publishing fraudulent science; and the Institute for Creation Research, a Texas outfit that rejects evolution and promotes Biblical creationism and the notion that “All things in the universe were created and made by God in the six literal days of the Creation Week.” 
Sam Pearsall, a UNC environment and ecology professor and retired program manager for the Environmental Defense Fund described the presentation as “the most remarkable example of propaganda delivered as anti-propaganda” he had ever witnessed.
NC-20 brought forward a bill that would restrict how state agencies and planners predict sea-level change. An early version set out to ban the state from using current data models to predict sea-level change caused by climate change. A later version bans predictions of sea level rise “unless such rates are from statistically significant, peer-reviewed data and are consistent with historic trends.”
According to WRAL, that would essentially ban projections based on cliamate change as these results would be inconsistent with historic trends. The following is an excerpt from the NC-20 memo that was obtained by WRAL.com (emphasis added): 
“Bottom Line: we got everything we asked for. I'll send the technical details later, but we got a commitment to totally abandon any reference to accelerated SLR. Instead, the State will use historic, linear sea level measurements to create future projections (about 8 inches by 2100 instead of the 56 inches once being considered) and the provision of standard deviations which are basically fluctuations around the average projection at any given year. This is a huge win for NC 20 counties which always seem to lose in regulatory negotiations. It proves once again that unity is the key to advancing the cause of equity for NC 20 in matters such as regulation and economic development.”
John Droz demanded a retraction by WRAL, claiming that NC-20 had not been involved in the regulation despite the above memo.
May 21 - 23, 2012
John Droz was a speaker at the Heartland Institute's Seventh International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC7).
DeSmogBlog researched the co-sponsors behind Heartland's ICCC7 and found that they had collectively received over $67 million from ExxonMobil, the Koch Brothers and the conservative Scaife family foundations.
Droz was a member of a group who critiqued the 2010 “NC Sea-Level Rise Assessment Report” by the Coastal Resource Commission's Science Panel that had stated sea levels in Carolina would rise one meter by 2100. 
An article in the local paper, Beaufort County Now, reported that “Self-proclaimed physicist, economist and environmentalist John Droz. Jr. witnessed to the Beaufort County Commissioners that not only should the the Pantego Wind Farm project not be constructed, but no wind turbine generating power should be erected anywhere.”
Droz summarized his belief that “Wind energy is not a technically sound solution to provide us power, or to meaningfully reduce global warming,” “wind energy is not an economically viable source of power on its own,” and “wind energy is not environmentally responsible.” 
Droz is involved in setting up an activist network opposed to wind power and has developed a strategy to combat wind industry advocates by “communicate[ing] the Science message in the proper way to the public.”
His objectives include to “come up with an effective National PR Plan.”
Droz's list of “Our Typical Opponents” includes the wind industry, utilities supporting wind power, labour unions, most environmental organizations, pro-wind media, and many academic institutions. 
December 5, 2011
Was a presenter at a John Locke Foundation workshop titled “The Truth About Wind Power on the Coasts of North Carolina.” 
According to the event description, “This workshop will present an alternative view of wind power and what it would mean to North Carolina’s coastal communities. Participants will learn about wind power in general, including its intermittency problems, high costs, limited value and its environmental and economic impact. Myths will be countered, including why wind power would not play any meaningful role in energy security.”
The other presenters included David W. Schnare and Daren Bakst.
According to a search of Google Scholar, John Droz does not appear to have published any articles in peer-reviewed journals on the subject of climate or any other topic.
“Fellows & Advisors,” American Tradition Institute. Accessed May 4, 2012.
John Droz. “The Power of Energy,” October 2, 2008. Available at SSRN.
“Does the Pantego Wind Project Make Sense?”, Power Point Presentation by John Droz, Jr., January 2012.
“Wind Power Facts” homepage. Accessed March 4, 2012.
“ATI Fellow, John Droz, Convinces State to Rethink Climate-Related Policy,” American Tradition Institute, March 1, 2012.
“Beaufort County Commissioners hear from citizens on separate issues,” Beaufort County Now, January 10, 2012.
“Why I Think Science is Our Best Strategy,” Power point presentation by John Droz, Jr. February, 2012.
“Workshop - “The Truth About Wind Power on the Coasts of North Carolina,” Crystal Coast Tea Party, November 17, 2011.
“Board of Directors,” NC-20. Accessed May 4, 2012.
Sue Sturgis. “Climate conspiracy theorist returns to NC legislature, warns of threat from science 'elite',” Facing South, February 7, 2013.
Laura Leslie. “Sea-level bill: Who is John Droz?”, WRAL.com, June 6, 2012.