“An exposĂ© of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Judge tells US to decide on polar bears, poll tells presidential hopefuls to gird for action

A federal judge has rejected the Bush Administration’s bid for further delay and ordered it to decide by May 15 whether to provide protection for polar bears whose Arctic habitat is melting due to global warming.

The decision could also lead to restrictions on oil and gas exploration offshore Alaska and curbs on greenhouse emissions.

Meanwhile, a new poll has found that two-thirds of adult Americans believe the next president should do something about climate change, pronto.

The court decision requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to decide whether to list the polar bear as endangered, or to put it in a lesser category of risk such as threatened, or to keep it off the list entirely - an option that would lead to further legal action from the conservation coalition.

If it is listed, campaigners will argue anything that might impinge on the bear's habitat, such as recently announced plans for oil and gas exploration off the Alaskan coast, must either be cancelled or put under more rigorous scrutiny. They will also argue the only way to prevent the Arctic becoming entirely ice-free in summer in the coming decades is to make drastic cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions.

Two years ago, scientists compiling the Red List of Threatened Species included polar bears, listing them as Vulnerable to Extinction. Warming seas and a marked decline in ice during summer made it likely, they concluded, that numbers would fall by one third within three generations.

The White House had stalled since the original petition went forward in 2005. Judge Claudia Wilken of U.S. District Court ruled the government was in breach of its obligations: "Defendants have been in violation of the law requiring them to publish the listing determination for nearly 120 days."

The court decision broke simultaneously with a new poll showing Americans not only want the next president to have a policy on climate change but also to take action against global warming soon after taking power.

Bill Becker, executive director of the non-partisan Presidential Climate Action Project, which commissioned the survey, said "when asked about the overall importance of climate change, it is clear from these numbers that strong majorities of American voters want action on the issue, and expect our next president to do something soon after taking office."

All in all, not one of W's better days. Be interesting to know what Hillary, Barry and Johnny think of the poll results.



FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.