brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Massive Profits, High Gas Prices and $33 billion in Taxpayer Giveaways to Big Oil

Over the next 5 years oil companies will receive $33 billion in taxpayer funded giveaways.

According to the report set to be released tomorrow morning by the Friends of the Earth, (pdf) the $33 billion in taxpayer dollars will come to Big Oil through tax loopholes, royalty rollbacks and research and development subsidies.

"This is a tremendous sum for taxpayers to be doling out to the oil and gas industry," said Friends of the Earth's Erich Pica, who authored the analysis. "The corporate fat cats at these big oil companies are already earning record profits-they don't need our tax dollars too.  There are far smarter places to use this money, including bringing down energy costs by investing in the clean power sources of the future, such as wind and solar."

Friends of the Earth's analysis found that over the next five years oil companies stand to gain at least $23.2 billion from tax loopholes, $3.8 billion in royalty rollbacks, $1.6 billion in direct subsidies for research and development, and $4.3 billion through accounting gimmicks. 

The analysis found that tax giveaways have increased dramatically since the passage of a Republican-drafted energy bill in 2005.

 

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#437898
Loren. +0; Wed, 2008-07-30 17:39; Who are the real crooks
Loren (not verified)

Who are the real crooks though, how much money will the government be making off the taxes placed on oil in the next 5 years.

#437974
Kevin Grandia. +1; Wed, 2008-07-30 18:27; Not much

The US government collects about $7 billion a year from the oil and gas sector - roughly 12%. To put it in perspective, the Alberta government in Canada collected $13 billion in royalties in 2005-06 at a royalty rate between 20 and 40% - that's a single province in Canada collecting more in royalties than all of the US.

Here's the US data on royalties for 2007:
http://www.api.org/aboutoilgas/sectors/explore/royalty.cfm

Here's the Canadian data (pdf):
http://tinyurl.com/5mycku

ExxonMobil's profits were $10.9 billion for the first three months of this year alone.

#437997
Paul Z. +0; Wed, 2008-07-30 18:41; =ExxonMobil's profits were
Paul Z (not verified)

=ExxonMobil's profits were $10.9 billion for the first three months of this year alone.= Kevin Grandia

Is there a problem with that amount Kevin? As a percentage of revenues, Exxon's profits are average.

#438645
John. +0; Thu, 2008-07-31 02:00; But no need to subsidize
John (not verified)

Their profits may be average, but the point is that there is no need to continue to subsidize their R&D. Let them fund it themselves like any other company.

#439074
Ray. +0; Thu, 2008-07-31 06:40; John, I assume you would be
Ray (not verified)

John, I assume you would be willing to apply that policy to wind and solar too?

#439135
Nick Berning. +0; Thu, 2008-07-31 07:16; I hope not. Wind and solar
Nick Berning (not verified)

I hope not. Wind and solar are far more desirable forms of energy than oil, because they don't result in the emission of heat-trapping gases that cause global warming.

There's a public good served when we invest our tax dollars in clean technologies. It's just a waste of money to throw billions of tax dollars at Big Oil, especially when it's experiencing record profits.

#439768
John. +0; Thu, 2008-07-31 14:03; Yes, if...
John (not verified)

Yes, if Wind and Solar were making a couple billion a quarter. Maybe even if they made only a single billion. :-)

Again, and not trying to pick on the "big oil" here but if they make that much, they don't need subsidies. Subsidies are encouraging the market to move in a direction when the market can't support itself. Anything more is a giveaway.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Richard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - Black and WhiteClimate Cover-Up Book CoverHoggan, Robertson, Harcourt

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers