Are you past your "Best Before" date?
 Bill Miller |
    More than just a pain in the butt, those pesky speed bumps also hasten global warming8 Nov 07
Canada’s housing agency has concluded that speed bumps not only fuel anger among drivers -- who have to slow down to approach a bump, then speed up, then slow down for the next one -- but also increase fuel consumption and cause more greenhouse-gas emissions than if they were traveling at a constant speed. A study by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. has found that traffic-calming measures such as speed bumps, speed humps (wider bumps), raised intersections, traffic circles and stop signs actually “increase automobile emissions and reduce air quality” – the exact opposite of what is needed in the battle against global warming. These band-aid solutions to bad planning also come with a high price tag. Speed humps -- which cost $3,000 a pop -- are "very difficult to install" and if they don't get the height exactly right the cars bottom out, diverting tax dollars needed to fund sustainable transportation. CMHC is touting a fused-grid pattern combining the compact street patterns introduced before cities were overwhelmed by cars, with the looping suburban streets of today, which discourage walking and cycling because it takes so long to get anywhere. The CMHC version would combine the traditional grid pattern with cul-de-sacs and T-intersections, connected with footpaths and parks to encourage pedestrians. There would be less road surface, improving rainwater management and making neighborhoods quieter, safer and more sociable. Let’s hope they can sell their ideas to engineers and developers.  Canada CMHC speed bumps development global warming climate change |
He's past it, alright
Submitted by FEMACK on Fri, 2007-11-09 04:45.
and gets more rancid by the day . . .
» reply
Rob, you're the only
Submitted by Lurker (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-09 08:01.
Rob, you're the only "regular" here whose posts are always worth reading. Do you perchance have a blog of your own?
» reply
Yes, he does
Submitted by FEMACK on Fri, 2007-11-09 08:57.
www.sayanythingblog.com
You're welcome to it . . .
» reply
Wrong
Submitted by rob (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-09 12:46.
"FEMACK" (real name Fern Mackenzie), a real-estate agent in Ketchum,Idaho (http://sothebyshomes.com/sunvalley/agents/Fern.Mackenzie), thinks I must have a blog because someone else named Rob has one.
Then again, as you've seen, she's not the sharpest knife in the drawer. But you knew that.
» reply
All and sundry
Submitted by FEMACK on Fri, 2007-11-09 13:49.
are invited to check me out. I live in the Ottawa area, and am listed with the Library and Archives Canada as a freelance researcher at http://www.collectionscanada.ca/the-public/005-2063-e.html. I have a BA (Hons) from Queen's University at Kingston, and a Master of Arts from the same institution. I have worked in the Ottawa area for the past 25 years, doing research and analysis re: heritage buildings. Anybody who feels that they need to verify my identification (including Rob) is free to call me at 613-720-4159 (my cell phone number). My email address is fern.mackenzie@sympatico.ca.
Go ahead, Rob. Do your worst.
» reply
Looks like I need to get a restraining order
Submitted by rob (not verified) on Sat, 2007-11-10 14:20.
Jesus. Fern Mackenzie is one creepy obsessed stalker.
» reply
The North Dakota Rob is
Submitted by VJ on Fri, 2007-11-09 17:31.
The North Dakota Rob is obnoxious and dishonest. The Rob who claims he is Canadian is indistinguishable from the other Rob. As far as I am concerned they are the same Rob until one of them proves otherwise.
If Rob registered with this site his name would not have (Not Verified) behind it on each post.
» reply
Giving the Boot to Bumps
Submitted by rob (not verified) on Thu, 2007-11-08 21:16.
The best way to deal with speed bumps is to drive a 4x4 with at least a 4" suspension-lift and 36" Mickey Thompsons.
It puts the "speed" back in speed bumps. Mainly airspeed.
Trust me on this one.
» reply
Where I live in Sydney, you
Submitted by Pete (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-09 00:25.
Where I live in Sydney, you actually have to slow down and for Cyclists who ride along taking up half the lane, more so then for speed bumps. If only they would use the bike paths.
» reply
Although it can be
Submitted by FEMACK on Fri, 2007-11-09 04:56.
Although it can be frustrating, cyclists are legally entitled to the same space as a car (where I live, anyway), as are motorcycles. It's great if there ARE bike paths that go where you want to go -- not always possible.
It's not just the swooping suburban streets that discourage walking & cycling -- narrow sidewalks, sidewalk clutter (signage, bike racks, planters etc), and those awful commercial areas lined with big box stores & acres of parking -- none of it is particularly pedestrian-friendly. The basic assumption behind urban/suburban planning has been that we will all use cars. Now what?
» reply
Most of the roadway problems
Submitted by Carl Szczerski (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-09 05:41.
Most of the roadway problems with bikes, buses and cars is that road planning didnt includes bikes really in their design when first created. Diamond lanes are used here in Winnipeg as designated bus and bike lanes at certain times of the day, that helps. But I also think adding in designated bike paths along major roadways and not some off the way bike trails would be good to. I've never seen so many people biking now the roads it only makes sense that city planners should consider their effect when evaluating and designing roadways.
» reply
Likewise in Ottawa
Submitted by FEMACK on Fri, 2007-11-09 06:21.
Even now as the temperature is falling, there are still many people out there pedalling to work in insulated lycra! Everywhere roadwork is being done, they are putting in bike lanes -- a major improvement (although I was once hit by a car while riding in a bike lane). Ultimately, fewer and fewer cars and more efficient & safe mass transit will mean a safer cycling environment, encouraging more people to get on their bikes.
» reply
Using the ol' noodle!
" ...which discourage walking and cycling because it takes so long to get anywhere."
Brilliant! We'll just pass a law that says everything will now be closer, to make it easier to walk to. That way, I could walk from Toronto to Buenos Aires in a leisurely afternoon stroll.
And since we can pass legislation that modifies the time-space continuum, it should be easy to enact a few local ordnances to control the weather.
Global Clima-Doom: Solved.
Who knew saving the Earth from it's assured apocalypse would be this easy?