Just another example of Gore’s bad science and your ability to spin incompetence into positive proof of your position. The little things, like Gore’s misrepresentation of Kilimanjaro and your own Ross Gelbspan thinking that Autrailia’s national bird is the ostrich, that show that proof of your thesis is based on poor choices.

“nearly every other glacier around the globe.” Good thing you said “nearly” since many, like PioXI and San Rafael are growing. Too bad there guys. more bad science. And gosh, retreating glaciers in Europe are exposing Neolithic sites where humans hunted, mined ore and camped. At one mine site, tools were piled up, indicating that the miners expected to return after the next spring thaw which never happened. Must have been there before the last ice age I guess.

I think this is absolutely fine. Shows the science is working and getting out without fear nor favour. So this example puts down any assertions of censorship in the climate science. The authors do point out however that there is very good AGW science to correlate with temperate glaciers melting. Al Gore is NOT the definitive source on matters AGW and has some things not well positioned. His sea level rise aspects for example are well outside the IPCC advice (although he didn’t exactly say “when” his level of melting may have occurred). However I think that unlike the contrarian camp you guys need to play the game with a very straight bat and acknowledge issues that change or don’t go the “AGW way”. Your credibility will be much higher as a result. For example you will also remember that Realclimate was not sold on the data that the thermohaline is slowing. It did turn out to be incorrect and erroneous data analysis. Other example is hesitancy to claim the mid-troposheric warming over Antarctia is definitely AGW. Guys play a very precise and tough game against your scumbag opponents. Don’t be too shrill if things don’t always fall into line and don’t hide from it.

Yet another example of “fake but accurate”, eh?

If the Global Warming alarmists are wrong about this, then what else are they wrong about?

Oh, sorry. I keep forgetting. The science is “settled”.