Nimbyland's No-Wind Situation

Mon, 2008-04-14 08:55Ross Gelbspan
Ross Gelbspan's picture

Nimbyland's No-Wind Situation

The Washington Post, April 13, 2008 – Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) announced yesterday morning that he will bar commercial wind turbines from state-owned land, satisfying Western Maryland opponents of the turbines but disappointing supporters of the wind energy industry.

Previous Comments

I think this deserves more discussion.

1) We need all the windpower we can get.

2) However, it isn’t instantly obvious that putting windmills in a state forest, thereby cutting down at least some trees, is necessarily the optimal place to do it.

3) Without further information on the specific sites, it’s not really obvious whether this is indeed just knee-jerk NIMBYism or actually a sensible decision (for now) on the part of Gov. Martin.

Someone was telling me today about how much Saskatchewan farmers get per oil drill on their land. Why not windmills? There’s a windmill farm proposed for agricultural land near my village, and the Nimbys are getting ready to rumble, but I think it’s a great idea – certainly better that those hideous high-tension power line towers we’ve all gotten used to over the years.

Fern Mackenzie

This is pretty damned nifty.
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1476/86/

Using jet engine technology to re-imagine the wind turbine.
Allowing for 4x the energy from the same land area, and a hell of a lot easier logistics and manufacturing.

[x]

For more than a year, oil giant BP has waged a massive public relations battle to convince Americans that the company has been bamboozled by the oil spill claims process relating to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig blowout.

This BP PR campaign has involved full-page newspaper ads paid for...

read more