DeSmogBlog thoroughly investigates the academic and industry backgrounds of those involved in the PR spin campaigns that are confusing the public and stalling action on global warming. If there's anyone or any organization, ( i.e. scientist, self-professed "expert," think tank, industry association, company) that you would like to see researched and reported on DeSmogBlog, please contact us here and we will try our best.
If you need something more quickly, please let us know and we can arrange to have the process expedited for a small fee to cover research costs.
Please select from the dropdown menus below:
The American Council for Capital Formation (ACCF) is a Washington, DC-based free market think tank.
According to ExxonSecrets, the ACCF has received over $1.6 million from oil-giant ExxonMobil for "climate change activities."
According to a 2004-05 document (pdf), the ACCF and their affiliate organizations have also received funding from other energy-sector and automobile companies and organizations, such as the American Gas Association, the American Petroleum Institute, the Edison Electric Institute, Ford Motor Company, Nuclear Energy Institute and the Marathon Oil Corporation.
There are 32 individuals listed as members of the ACCF board.
Of the 32 board members:
6 members represent the energy, automobile and manufacturing sectors. For example, Red Cavaney, President of the American Petroleum Institute, and John Engler, President of the National Association of Manufacturers sit on the ACCF board.
Many other members of the board are prominent Republicans including Kenneth Duberstein, former Chief of Staff to President Reagan, and former Reagan Secretary of State, George Schultz.
In March 2008, the ACCF's Vice President, Margo Thorning, teamed up with the National Association of Manufacturers, the US Chamber of Commerce and a think tank called the Alliance for Energy and Economic Growth, to conduct a four-State speaking tour to discredit the proposed America's Climate Security Act authored by US Senators Joe Lieberman and John Warner.
Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.
There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.
Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.
Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.
Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!
| Desmogblog monthly book give-away |
|
| Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming |

The good news is that solutions to global warming exist, check out Ross Gelbspan’s Green Sheet and his vision for a pathway to climate peace. Or, check out the latest below: