brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Oil funded Heartland pleads innocence

The Heartland Institute, a notorious US climate change skeptic group, responded to a letter the DeSmogBlog team recently penned for the Philadelphia Daily News. Creating a perception of impartiality is their theme on the issue of tobacco and climate change science. Is it then just a coincidence that the same groups funded by oil money, such as Heartland, are the same groups “skeptical” about climate change?

Here are the facts on Heartland’s funding. You be the judge as to their objectivity on the issue of climate change:
       
        • $561,500 from Exxon Mobil
        • Over $400,000 from oil money-backed foundations

True to form, Heartland tries to bring into question the DeSmogBlog’s motivations and credibility by attacking our funding source, the Lefebvre Foundation, whose money is derived from the former President of the secure online transaction service NeTeller, John Lefebvre. Sorry Heartland, nice try. I know it is hard to understand that some people do what they do for reasons other than economic gain.
What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#141347
Rosetta Bradford. +0; Mon, 2007-12-17 18:40; Bertram Miller
Rosetta Bradford (not verified)

putredinal resplendence parabaptization cathars exodontia duvetyn metascutal arfvedsonite
The Castle Hotel
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/arth/meister/expedtxt.htm

#165
Steve Sturgill. +0; Mon, 2006-07-10 12:14; Letter
Steve Sturgill (not verified)

I would have liked to read your letter to the Philadelphia Daily News. The link you provided only leads to their front page, and they've got your letter behind a pay wall. How about reprinting it here?

#166
K Grandia. +0; Mon, 2006-07-10 13:14; Here is the Philly Daily letter
K Grandia (not verified)

Hi Steve,

Thanks for the interest. I am not sure of copyright and going past the pay wall -- so here is the letter I submitted that has Heartland's knickers in a knot.

- Kevin

 

Who are we to believe? Gore or Heartland Institute?

Joseph Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, wrote an opinion piece that appeared in today’s Philadelphia Daily News, asking readers whom they would believe, Al Gore or scientists.

It is interesting to observe that the cadre of scientists Bast refers to as proof that Gore is wrong seems to be getting smaller and their collective expertise in the area of climate change continues to diminish as more and more jump off the climate denial bandwagon. For instance, Bast claims Tim Ball, former professor at the University of Winnipeg, to be an “expert” on climate change, when in fact Dr. Ball has not published any research in a peer-reviewed science journal in the last 20 years.

All this becomes even more questionable when you question the source of this article, Joseph Bast himself. When the Heartland Institute, of which Bast is the President, isn’t attacking climate change science, they spend their time attacking the science behind the negative effects of tobacco smoke. Not really a surprise when you learn that Heartland has been an industry sponsored PR front for the tobacco industry for many years.

I guess it also comes as no surprise, that much like the other self-professed “non-partisan” and objective US think tanks like the George C. Marshall Institute, the Hudson Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heartland Institute with Mr. Bast at helm, has received hundreds of thousands from oil interests over the years.

A glance at Bast's list of scientists reveals Robert Balling, who has been funded by coal and mining companies, Sallie Baliunas, whose work has been funded by the American Petroleum Institute and John Christy who has been sponsored by the extremely conservative, contrarian and oil-backed Marshall Institute, among others.

So the question shouldn’t be whether I believe Gore. It should be: why would anybody believe anything Bast writes? As the old saying goes, fool me once…

 

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
James Hoggan - Black and WhiteJames Hoggan - ColourHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers