... or a voice for those who aren't aren't Marxists pretending to be "environmentalists".

Thanks again for making it clear what your real aims are.

"It is true you do seem to have missed out on a quality education,"

Actually, I've had a first-rate education from some of finest schools envious lumpen-proles like you can only dream of. But thanks for asking.

" sadly your blind ideology prevents you from seeing reason."

My ideology is not so blind that I can't see the blatant lunacy of holding up a basket case nation like Haiti as a role model to be emulated. I'm also not so blind that I can't see the obvious lust you idiots have for statist intervention in the economy, and your Mugabe-esque love of wealth redistribution.

And it's not just me. Read this candid statement from a member of the Liberal Party of Canada:

"The Liberal Party’s Green Shift announced on June 19th marked the most aggressive anti-poverty program in 40 years. The ‘shift’ will transfer wealth from rich to poor, from the oil patch to the rest of the country, and from the coffers of big business to the pockets of low-income Canadians. [...]

I invite and encourage everyone to visit thegreenshift.ca to see how this comprehensive plan will benefit low-income Canadians. I will continue to work collaboratively with my Liberal colleagues towards a fairer, richer, greener Canada." -- Ken Boshcoff, MP

http://netnewsledger.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=967&Itemid=28

So, you see, Carl, it's blatantly obvious what is intended under the aegis of Global Warming hysteria. Now tell me again that it's not just another tax-grab.

"Sustainability isn’t something that requires political affiliation to comprehend, its scientific,"

Sorry, buddy, but your neurotic obsession with "sustainability", or whatever the latest buzzword, is entirely an delusional construct on your part. There's nothing "scientific" about it. Nothing is "sustainable". Ultimately entropy wins. We all die.

"but then again you don’t understand much of science either."

Coming from a junior Lysenkoist like you, that's a pretty laughable statement. You seem to make it a lot. You'd almost think you have an inferiority complex. Pretty sad, actually.

"To reduce consumption, well increase efficiency for starters that reduces waste (likely countless things that can be done here)."

Gee, you sound like you just discovered fire. Golly, nobody ever thought of that! Evidently, you never stopped to consider we don't need state intervention to do that. The laws of supply and demand dictate efficiency automatically.

"Convert to renewable forms of electricity generation, like solar and wind, instead of limited resources like those derived from fossil sources."

You have a bizarre notion of which forms of energy are limited! If, for example, gasoline is such a "limited" resource, why can most of us easily afford to buy it at market prices? What we can't afford, is to heat our homes with limited astronomically expensive energy sources like summer breezes and sunshine. Aside from very tiny boutique markets, there is virtually zero demand for it.

"Tax incentives for those who reduce their consumptive patterns, like tax credits for vehicle efficiency, or rebates."

Why? Obviously this is an admission on your part that gasoline isn't expensive enough, because it's not as scarce as you'd prefer, and you need government intervention to thwart the market. We already get taxed for consumption. Someone who drives an El Dorado pays proportionaly more in taxes on fuel than someone who rides a moped.

But I don't need an opressive nanny-state government to force me to "reduce my consumptive patterns", either through taxation or ration lines. That's not their mandate, and if I can help it, it never will be.

"Conversely tax over consumption, for morons like you, who can pay for the rebates for people like me, thanks btw."

Over-consumption? Just who gets to arbitrarily dictate what that is? So it sounds like your plan is indeed a socialist wealth redistribution scheme. Take money from successful people (or, "morons", as you refer to us) -- and hand it over to losers like you, so we can all live happily like Haitian peasants. Interesting that your fantasy belies so much bitterness and envy on your part.

"And plus a million other ideas other there. So, yeah I have and some things are already being implemented today, by folks smarter and better versed than I about finding solutions to sustainability issues. Only just at the tip of this iceberg."

What the hell does that word-salad even mean? Obviously, this the result of your "quality education".

"I don't see why global warming shouldn't be treated as a WMD unleashed by the Harper and Bush administrations."

You've uncovered their plot, Phillip! Now that you know about their secret weather machine, hidden in the basement of the White House, expect a visit from The Men In Black.

"The collective farms idea is extreme but preferable to the present situation of attempted Conservative brainwashing."

Nice theory, but it presumes you have a brain to wash. Take solace in the fact that you are immune.

"Strange we are both using prosperity as our goal."

I'll worry about my own prosperity, thanks. But you are mistaken. While prosperity may be one of my goals, in your case, it seems to be nothing more than an illucid wishful fantasy, from a disordered mind.

But, hey, who knows? Maybe if you wish really, really hard?

"Weird english language."

Perhaps if you apply yourself, it may one day seem less mysterious to you. Plus the other kids in your special-ed class might mock you less, and you'll be able to focus on what you're good at -- eating paste.