brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Outrage in the Climate Science Community Continues Over the "500 Scientist" List

Earlier today we broke the story about dozens of scientists outraged at the use of their good names in an article by Heartland Institute's "Senior Fellow" Dennis Avery (pictured above) posted on their website entitled 500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares.

The article is written by Dennis Avery, a "Senior Fellow" at the Heartland Institute. The article which was first published by another think tank called the Hudson Institute, where Avery is also listed as a "Senior Fellow," has bounced around the internet as proof that there is great doubts about the realities of human-caused global warming.

The letters are pouring in from angry scientists, with over 45 scientists now demanding that there names be stricken from the list, some are going much further and threatening legal action.

Here's some more quotes:

I am very shocked to see my name in the list of "500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares". Because none of my research publications has ever indicated that the global warming is not as a consequence of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, I view that the inclusion of my name in such list without my permission or consensus has damaged my professional reputation as an atmospheric scientist."

Dr. Ming Cai, Associate Professor, Department of Meteorology, Florida State University.

Just because you document natural climate variability doesn't mean anthropogenic global warming is not a threat. In fact I would venture that most on that list believe a natural cycle and anthropogenic change combined represent a greater threat."

Peter F. Almasi, PhD Candidate in Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Columbia University

 

Why can't people spend their time trying to identify and evaluate the facts concerning climate change rather than trying to obscure them?"

Dr. James P. Berry, Senior Scientist, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

They have taken our ice core research in Wyoming and twisted it to meet their own agenda. This is not science."

Dr. Paul F. Schuster, Hydrologist, US Geological Survey

Please remove my name IMMEDIATELY from the following article and from the list which misrepresents my research."

Dr. Mary Alice Coffroth, Department of Geology, State University of New York at Buffalo

And if you REALLY liked this story, please consider helping us out with our research by sending along a small (or large) donation.

<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->

<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->

 

 

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#281839
Frank Bi. +1; Tue, 2008-04-29 15:36; This is comedic gold

And comedic gold deserves to be preserved for all time, so here are WebCite archives for the abstract and the list proper:

http://www.webcitation.org/5XSCQEGSW
http://www.webcitation.org/5XSCb5PKN

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://frankbi.wordpress.com/ International Journal of Inactivism
"Al `Fat Al' Gore [is fat]" -- Harold Pierce

#286767
Till. +0; Thu, 2008-05-01 12:54; Doesn't work
Till (not verified)

The first one gives me only a 404?

#281843
Frank Bi. +1; Wed, 2008-04-30 02:50; -

[double post]

#282327
Jeff W. +0; Tue, 2008-04-29 20:15; You'd think such a good
Jeff W (not verified)

You'd think such a good looking guy as Frank Avery could find a real job. How can these people look at themselves in the mirror? Literally?

#282837
jo abbess. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 01:14; drop the prejudice
jo abbess (not verified)

as someone without gorgeous genes, i resent that remark about the looks of frank avery. i mean, i wouldn't want to have to look at him while i'm eating breakfast, but please, enough with your prejudicial gene-ism ! the problem with avery is the high likelihood of bad connections between his neurons, forming demonstrably wrong ideas.

#282847
jo abbess. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 01:19; frank avery's bad ideas...
jo abbess (not verified)

...and i mean, just one look at him reveals he has very bad ideas about what constitutes acceptable facial hair arrangements. if he can get his science as out-of-date as his beard, then he just cannot be trusted !

#282855
jo abbess. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 01:21; and anyway...
jo abbess (not verified)

...isn't his name dennis, not frank ?

#282476
John Mashey. +1; Tue, 2008-04-29 21:50; But there's more...

Check out:
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=23085
"Hundreds More Scientists Acknowledge Natural 1,500-Year Climate Cycle"
i.e., support Singer/Avery book...
and it points at: http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=23085
"Research of Hundreds More Scientists Shows the Natural 1,500-Year Climate Cycle".

#283016
SuburbanGrrrl. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 02:41; Get a lawyer
SuburbanGrrrl (not verified)

I'm no lawyer but boy I'd be asking all my fellow colleagues whether there is any basis for legal action. Mr Avery and his ilk need to be cut off where it hurts.

On the other hand, perhaps Keith Olberman will identify Mr. Avery as his worst person in the world.

#283448
troll. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 06:56; Interesting
troll (not verified)

Interesting that posts are being censored now.
HMMMMMM.

Last desperate move by a dying AGW scam?

#283545
Troll. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 07:38; Sounds familiar
Troll (not verified)

Sounds a lot like the complaints from scientists that had to fight to get their names removed from the IPCC fantacy papers.

Amazing what having your funding threatened will do to your stand on a good scam.

Follow the money.

#283711
Frank Bi. +1; Wed, 2008-04-30 09:34; Stupid conspiracy theory, strike 2

Troll, still trying to detect Bolshevist plots using Bible Code methodologies?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://frankbi.wordpress.com/ International Journal of Inactivism
"Al `Fat Al' Gore [is fat]" -- Harold Pierce

#283790
Troll. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 10:06; A better one
Troll (not verified)

Great article on the origins of global warming -
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Articles%202007/GWHoaxBorn.pdf

#283795
Frank Bi. +1; Wed, 2008-04-30 10:09; Keep the smoke bombs coming,

Keep the smoke bombs coming, Troll. They're entertaining.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://frankbi.wordpress.com/ International Journal of Inactivism
"Al `Fat Al' Gore [is fat]" -- Harold Pierce

#283971
Brian D. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 11:44; LaRouche
Brian D (not verified)

Of course, Troll doesn't inform people that 21st Century Science and Technology is the 'scientific' front of Lyndon LaRouche, the infamous conspiracy theorist and all-around nutter.

Troll, is the Queen of England the leader of an international drug cartel?

#284078
exusian. +0; Wed, 2008-04-30 12:55; Troll is just desperately
exusian (not verified)

Troll is just desperately trying to stave off his irrelevance.

#286788
Till. +0; Thu, 2008-05-01 13:02; Germany
Till (not verified)

I just quickly scanned some of the authors from Germany from the list, and I'm pretty sure almost everyone doesn't belong on the list.

Take Prof.
Stefan Rahmstorf -- on his website he actually publishes essays bringing down "scepticsts" argumentation point for point.

#705043
Emilyen. +1; Wed, 2009-05-13 21:16; Outrage in the Climate Science Community Continues Over the "500

Thanks for this timely exposure of the Heartland Institute. The tactics this group uses are exactly the same tactics used by creationists to try to discredit evolution. Why am I not surprised at this?

 

http://www.bestblogsite.org/

 

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Richard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - ColourClimate Cover-Up Book CoverJames Hoggan - Black and White

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers