This is a guest post by Climate Nexus.
A recent opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal by Rupert Darwall paints efforts to address climate change through international policy as doomed from the start, ignores recent progress and dismisses mounting...
read more




















Previous Comments
This article is a very good
This article is a very good example of what is wrong with the AGW movement.
IE: it is not at all relevent to the issue.
Energy security etc is an issue unto itself.
Its merrits can stand on their own.
There is absolutely no need to use the AGW scam as a lever to force movement on it.
lying about climate change to promote social change is what i find so objectionable.
Careful or they might call
Careful or they might call you a holocau..I mean climate denier. Oh no not that!
What a silly comment. Anyone
What a silly comment. Anyone with half an interest in the topic knows the US DoD and armed forces accept anthropogenic climate change as an imperative for action.
LOL.... I doubt they are
LOL….
I doubt they are really quite that stupid Actually.
However there is very little doubt that they know very well how to milk political fads for funding…
Anyone with any sense can see that.
"They are also working with
“They are also working with scientists to develop other biofuels and renewable energy sources to help power the military. Military leaders hope that within the next 10 years, more than half of the energy needs of the military will be met by renewable sources of energy.”
I hope they do this. Getting soldiers killed over oil has got to stop. Claiming the military are doing it to save the planet from climate change is absolutly bizaar and makes the author look like a fool. Besides, if the military finds an alternate fuel that can power my Humvee cheapre than gasoline, I’ll buy it. Wahoo!
Climate change is dead. Cheers.