Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Polling the Politicians On Alberta Oil Sands

Looks like the tables have been turned on political hopefuls in Alberta. Instead of them polling us, for once the politicians are being polled on their views of the Alberta oil sands development.

Launched by the Pembina Institute, the 5 minute online poll has been sent to all the candidates running in the current Alberta provincial election. The Pembina Institute's Dan Woynillowicz says:

Over the past few years, Albertans have been asked with increasing frequency to share their views on oil sands development with the Government and with pollsters. Now it's time to ask candidates who wish to serve in the next government to share their views on this important issue."

It's an interesting model, in that opinion polls are viewed as a representation of what the average individual in a specific demographic (in this case Albertans), and in turn it is expected (or at least hoped) in a democracy that politicians will represent the wants and the needs of that demographic.

To be able to compare what Albertans think about the oil sands to what Alberta politicians think about the oil sands is a great way of finding out which party and which candidates are in line with what Albertans want.

I've not seen this done before in Canada and it would be great to see what pollsters think of the idea.

Can't wait to see the results.

What's next?

secret

Are the identities of the polled kept secret? That is, are their choices not revealed (unless they want them to be)? It would be more accurate that way, so there's no grandstanding or fake answers.

Got word back that they will

Got word back that they will be providing the responses for each individual candidate. 

I'll Check

I'll send an inquiry to Pembina and see. 

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers