A lot of climate change deniers like to tout the fact [2] that they were an "Expert Reviewer" for the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a few DeSmog readers have been asking what exactly if takes to become an "Expert Reviewer." Well, thanks to our friend Tim Lambert at Deltoid Blog [3] it turns out that an "Expert Reviewer" really isn't as exciting and not nearly as prestigous as it sounds. Tim writes:
"Expert reviewer for the IPCC" doesn't mean that they asked him to review material -- all it means is that he asked to see the draft report [4]. The only real requirement to be a reviewer is to sign an agreement not to publicly comment on the draft."
I have confirmed this with one of the authors of the updated IPPC report.
Links:
[1] http://www.desmogblog.com/sites/beta.desmogblog.com/files/images/blog-feature-1202.jpg
[2] http://www.desmogblog.com/denying-climate-change-urging-inaction
[3] http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2006/05/you_too_can_be_a_leading_clima.php
[4] http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2006/05/yet_another_pointless_pile_of.php