The Keystone XL pipeline, currently awaiting a thumbs up or down on a presidential permit, has been the subject of ferocious debate. While proponents tout the pipeline project as a boon to national security, and a move that would reduce America's dependence on "unethical oil" , Its opponents are fearful of the environmental nightmare  it would create (to say nothing of the immnent threat of future devastating spills like last year's Michigan Kalamazoo spill) . The pipeline, if built, would increase siginificantly the import of dirty tar sands bitumen from Canada's oil sands to the U.S. by as much as 510,000 barrels a day.
What's been left out of the fierce debate over the pipeline, according to SolveClimate News , is the prospect that if president Obama okayed the Keystone XL pipeline, he would be handing a major victory and great financial opportunity to Charles and David Koch , his staunchest political enemies and the most powerful opponents of his clean economy agenda.
SolveClimate's analysis shows that Koch Industries is already responsible for close to 25 percent of the tar sands crude that is imported into the United States, and is well-positioned to cash in big from increased Canadian tar sands imports.
Proponents argue that Keystone is the "American" thing to do: it puts national security interests at the fore, and moves the United States away from reliance on foreign oil. As it turns out, the project is nothing more than a vote for corporate muscle and power. It hands two of the worst polluters in the country, both hell-bent on derailing a clean energy future, an all-access pass to grow their personal business fortune at the expense of the environment, the country and the planet.
Head on over to Solve Climate News  to read their full coverage.