“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Proud to be Canadian: NOT!

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking today at the close of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Sydney, said, "I’m also very pleased that the Sydney Declaration mirrors the Canadian climate change approach on many levels."

By which he clearly meant: We're not planning to do anything about it, either.

Canada's performance on this file has been - and continues to be - an international embarrassment, a mix of inaction and deception.

Harper's predecessor governments, in the hands of Liberal Prime Ministers Jean Chretien and Paul Martin, helped negotiate and then signed on to the Kyoto accord without making a single convincing policy gesture toward meeting the attendant emission reduction targets. Martin was even rude enough to lecture U.S. President George Bush for his failure to support Kyoto, even as the U.S. was outperforming Canada in slowing its rate of CO2 emission. 

Prime Minister Harper, who in the Liberal days denied that global warming was even a problem, now claims that his government is taking the issue seriously, but is "balancing environmental protection and economic growth." His idea of balance is to allow Canada's biggest and fastest growing emitter - the oil producers working the Alberta's tar sands - a blanket exemption to any (even voluntary) emission reduction targets.

The most charitable interpretation of the Harper government's position on this file is that it reflects a certain cognitive dissonance, the "uncomfortable tension that may result from having two conflicting thoughts at the same time, or from engaging in behavior that conflicts with one's belief."

The least charitable is that Harper is a leading participant in an oil-sponsored international effort to prevent immediate action against an urgent global environmental threat - i.e., that he is lying through his  teeth.

I would prefer to think that my Prime Minister is dilusional rather than dishonest, but woefully in the current circumstances, it amounts to the same thing.  



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"the Canadian climate change approach ... by which he clearly meant"

- hilarious ; )

"Project Green" was Paul Martin's Kyoto plan, budgeted in 2005 to cost $10 billion over 5 years. Money that would be well spent.

Harper's plan to date involves about $500 million in tax-credits or something. His very first act as Prime Minister was to cut over a dozen climate change research programs.
Ontario's auto industry could be transformed to be the world's wind turbine capital. Alberta's petroleum industry could be coaxed into becoming a materials science powerhouse. It will take a leader with environmental economics aptitude. It is simple, really. Impose a decade-long 3 cents per kw/h wind/solar/geothermal power production incentive. Kill the fossil fuel accelerated depreciation credits and tax shelters this year (before Kyoto comes into play in 2008).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xI4wMbRHDI&mode=related&search=

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.


www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.