Ross McKitrick

ross-mckitrick

Ross McKitrick

 Credentials 

  • Ph.D., Economics, University of British Columbia, (1996).
  • M.A., Economics, University of British Columbia, (1990).
  • B.A., Economics, Queen's University, (1988).

Source: [1]

 Background

McKitrick is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Guelph. According to McKitrick's profile at the Fraser Institute:

“McKitrick holds a BA in economics from Queen's University, and an MA and Ph.D. in economics from the University of British Columbia. He was appointed Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Guelph in 1996 and Associate Professor in 2000. His area of specialization is environmental economics and policy analysis. His current research areas include empirical modeling of the relationship between economic growth and pollution emissions; the impact of economic activity on the measurement of surface temperatures; and the climate change policy debate.” [2]

McKitrick is a Senior Fellow at the Fraser Institute, a libertarian think tank based in Vancouver, British Columbia. He co-authored the 2002 book, Taken By Storm with fellow climate skeptic Christopher Essex.

Stance on Climate Change

McKitrick is an endorser [3] of the Cornwall Alliance's “An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming,” which states:

“We deny that carbon dioxide—essential to all plant growth—is a pollutant. Reducing greenhouse gases cannot achieve significant reductions in future global temperatures, and the costs of the policies would far exceed the benefits.” [4]

Key Quotes

“I abhor Earth Hour. Abundant, cheap electricity has been the greatest source of human liberation in the 20th century. Every material social advance in the 20th century depended on the proliferation of inexpensive and reliable electricity.” [5]

“The bottom line for Canada is that Kyoto will precipitate a recession that will cause a permanent reduction in employment, income and the size of our economy. And if global warming is going to happen Kyoto will do nothing whatsoever to prevent it or even slow it down. Why are we still considering it?” [6]

Key Deeds

May, 2010

Spoke at the Heartland Institute's Fourth International Conference on Climate Change.

The conference's theme was “Reconsidering the Science and Economics,” and its purpose was “the same as it was for the first three events: to build momentum and public awareness of the global warming 'realism' movement.”

March 9, 2009

Spoke at the Heartland Institute's 2009 International Conference on Climate Change. [7]

DeSmogBlog researched the funding, and found sponsor organizations had received over $47 million from energy companies and right-wing foundations, with 78% of that total coming from the Scaife Family of foundations.

March 3, 2008

Spoke at the Heartland Institute's 2008 International Conference on Climate Change on the topic “Quantifying the Influence of Anthropogenic Surface Processes on Gridded Global Climate Data.”

February, 2007

McKitrick was the “coordinator” for the Fraser Institute's “Independent Summary for Policymakers” (ISPM) of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report.

The ISPM's conclusion is that “there will remain an unavoidable element of uncertainty as to the extent that humans are contributing to future climate change, and indeed whether or not such change is a good or bad thing.” [8]

Other authors included well known global warming skeptics such as Joseph D'aleo, Madhav Khandekar, William Kininmonth, Christopher Essex, Wibjorn Karlen, and Tad Murty.

2006

McKitrick was a co-author to a paper published by the Interfaith Stewardship Alliance (Now the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation) titled “A Call to Truth, Prudence and the Protection of the Poor: An Evangelical Response to Global Warming.”  Authors of paper included prominent deniers Calvin Beisner, Paul K. Driessen and Roy W. Spencer. [9]

The Cornwall Alliance's paper was a response to an open letter titled “Climate Change: An Evangelical Call to Action” which was created by a group titled the Evangelical Climate Initiative.

“An Evangelical Call to Action” concludes that:

  1. Climate Change is Real.
  2. The Consequences of Climate Change Will Be Significant, and Will Hit the Poor the Hardest.
  3. Christian Moral Convictions Demand Our Response to the Climate Change Problem.
  4. The need to act now is urgent. Governments, businesses, churches, and individuals all have a role to play in addressing climate change—starting now.

The Cornwall Alliance's paper contends that “All of these assumptions…are false, probably false, or exaggerated.”

January 27, 2005

Ross McKitrick and Steve McIntyre state their “research shows fundamental flaws in the 'hockey stick graph' used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” in a “backgrounder” produced to summarize their recently published articles: [19]

“The main error affects a step called principal component analysis (PCA). We showed that the PCA method as used by Mann et al. effectively mines a data set for hockey stick patterns. Even from meaningless random data (red noise), it nearly always produces a hockey stick.” [19]

2005

McKitrick appeared on a Friends of Science (FoS) video titled Climate Catastrophe Cancelled. Other prominent climate change skeptics are featured including Tim Ball, Sallie L. Baliunas and Tim Patterson.

The FoS website includes a description of Climate Catastrophe Cancelled: [10]

“Contrary to claims that the science of climate change has been settled, the causes of the past century’s modest warming is highly contested in the climate science community. The climate experts presenting in the video demonstrate that science is quickly diverging away from the hypothesis that the human release of greenhouse gases, specifically carbon dioxide, is having a significant impact on global climate. 'There is absolutely no convincing scientific evidence that human-produced greenhouse gases are driving global climate change,' stated climatologist, Dr. Tim Ball. He added that the Canadian government’s plan to designate carbon dioxide as a 'toxic' [sic] under CEPA is irresponsible and without scientific merit. 'Carbon dioxide is a staff of life, plain and simple. It makes up less than 4% of greenhouse gases and it is not a toxic.'[sic]”

According to SourceWatch, the recovered costs by FoS from the University of Calgary for “video production” in 2005 amounted to $80,731.

2003

McKitrick and Christopher Essex organized a press conference with the Cooler Heads Coalition in 2003 to publicize his and Essex's new book, Taken By Storm. [11]

Copies of the book were provided “compliments of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.”

2002

Ross McKitrick and Christopher Essex publish Taken By Storm: The Troubled Science, Policy and Politics of Global Warming. The book won the 2002 Donner Book Prize, a $10K award “paid for in part by the Donner Canadian Foundation, which contributed $20K toward writing the book in 2002.” [12]

October, 2000

McKitrick attended a October 2000 briefing organized by the Cooler Heads Coalition where he joined other sceptics in criticizing the Third Assessment Report (TAR) of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). [12]

The Cooler Heads coalition is a project of the National Consumers Coalition which is made up of 23 free market think tanks, many of them with ties to the oil-industry, including the Heartland Institute, the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, the Pacific Research Institute and the George C. Marshall Institute.

The Cooler Heads Coalition was originally a project of the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) which has received large donations from major corporations and industry foundations.  For example, the CEI has received $2,005,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.

September, 2000

McKitrick wrote a letter (PDF) to the Joint Standing Committee On Treaties Inquiry into the Kyoto Protocol, Parliament of Australia. 

McKitrick summarizes his points as follows: [13]

“I advise the Joint Standing Committee to recommend that Australia not ratify the Kyoto Protocol. This stance is justified on four grounds.

  • “The relative effect of GHG emissions on the global climate is subject to considerable uncertainty.
  • “Even if GHG emissions cause some warming, it will be slow and largely benign.
  • “Even if some aspect of global warming is harmful, the Kyoto Protocol will not stop it.
  • The costs of the Kyoto Protocol exceed any identifiable benefits.”

Nov 22, 1999

The Fraser Institute released a report in 1999 that disputed with the Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada that there were 339 endangered species. Instead, the Fraser Institute preferred its own conservative estimate of 91 endangered species. [14]

In a Canadian Press article, Stephen Legault, the spokesperson for Alberta Wilderness Association, described the report as “another effort at fearmongering and misinformation by a right-wing think tank.”

Sourcewatch reports that McKitrick sent a letter to the editor of the Guelph Mercury newspaper that accuses Legault of being “blinded by ideology.” McKitrick claimed that the U.S. Endangered Species Act “imposes draconian restrictions on use of private land on which rare species are present. Since these rules destroy property value, landowners across the U.S. now work to make their lands inhospitable to endangered species.”

 Affiliations 

 Publications

According to a search of 22,000 academic journals, McKtrick has published 14 peer-reviewed articles mainly in the area of economics and more recently on the topic of “Mann's hockey stick.” A full list of McKitrick's publications is available here.

Sample publications by McKitrick include:

  • Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming (2006). Co wrote with Patrick Michaels.
  • “Endangered Species Act dangerous,” Guelph Mercury (Ontario, Canada), November 22, 1999; page A5.
  • “Junk science,” National Post (Canada), Letter to the Editor, July 03, 2001 (Page C19).

 Resources

  1. Ross McKitrick CV,” University of Guelph. Accessed January, 2012.

  2. Ross McKitrick,” The Fraser Institute. Accessed January, 2012.

  3. Prominent Signers of An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming,” The Cornwall Alliance. Last updated January 14, 2010.

  4. An Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming,” The Cornwall Alliance. Accessed January, 2012.

  5. Earth Hour: Why I Will Leave My Lights On,” Vancouver Sun, March 26, 2011.

  6. Kyoto's Real Cost” (PDF), National Post, February 26, 2002.

  7. 2009 International Conference on Climate Change,” The Heartland Institute, February 1, 2009. Republished by Instituto Liberdade.

  8. “Independent Summary for Policymakers: IPCC Fourth Assessment Report” (PDF), The Fraser Institute, March 2, 2007.

  9. E. Calvin Beisner, Paul K. Driessen, Ross McKitrick, and Roy W. Spencer. A Call to Truth, Prudence, and Protection of the Poor: An Evangelical Response to Global Warming” (PDF), The Cornwall Alliance, 2006.

  10. Climate Catastrophe Cancelled: What You're Not Being Told About the Science of Climate Change” (2nd Edition.  Sept. 13, 2007.), Friends of Science.

  11. Cooler Heads Coalition Briefing With Christopher Essex And Ross McKitrick,” Competitive Enterprise Institute, February 26, 2003.

  12. Ross McKitrick,” SourceWatch Profile.

  13. “Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties Inquiry into the Kyoto Protocol Parliament of Australia” (PDF) Dr. Ross McKitrick, September 26, 2000.

  14. Laura Jones and liv Fredricksen. “Crying Wolf?: Public Policy on Endangered Species,” The Fraser Institute, October, 1999.

  15. Who We Are: Staff,” The Fraser Institute. Accessed January, 2012.

  16. Dr. Ross McKitrick,” George C. Marshall Institute. Accessed January, 2012.

  17. Academic Advisory Council,” The Global Warming Policy Foundation. Accessed January, 2012.

  18. Exxonsecrets Factsheet: Ross McKitrick.

  19. Ross McKitrick and Steve McIntyre. “Backgrounder,” Hockey Stick Project, January 27, 2005.

[x]
Fracking for natural gas

“We cannot solely rely on abundant gas to solve the climate change problem. The climate change problem requires a climate change solution. Abundant gas could be great for any number of things, but it is not going to solve the climate change problem.”

This statement was made by Haewon McJeon, the lead author on a new study published last week by Nature magazine, which concluded that...

read more