Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

Tue, 2006-09-19 17:27Sarah Pullman
Sarah Pullman's picture

Scientific American Slams the Wall Street Journal

Scientific American just published a somewhat scathing attack on the Wall Street Journal, accusing their editorial board of
hurling editorials of stunning misdirection at their readers, continuing their irresponsible drumbeat that global warming is junk science.

The DeSmogBlog would like to applaud them for their stern telling off of the paper. We couldn't have done it better ourselves:
The Wall Street Journal editorial page has for years railed against these scientific findings on climate change, even as the global consensus has reached nearly 100 percent of the scientific community.

Amen!



Previous Comments

…but rather Jeffrey D Sachs, Director of the Earth Institute, currently writing a column for Scientific American. This is not nitpicking. Scientific American’s Editorial Board may as well have “slammed” the WSJ on this or any other topic, but not on this occasion. I don’t think Mr Sachs can be considered “just another” journalist (iow he’s surely got a lot more editorial freedom than usual)
[x]
Bakken crude

Bakken petroleum: the substance of energy independence.

If you think that sounds like the latest branding from the oil industry’s public relations efforts, you might be right. However, it isn’t an ad — it is the title of the congressional hearing on Bakken oil on Tuesday.

When North Dakota congressman Kevin Cramer first announced he would hold this hearing, he promised to bring together the top scientists to discuss the properties of Bakken ...

read more