Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Sparks already flying at United Nation's climate talks

Didn't take long for word to get out that the UN climate change talks underway in Valencia, Spain are already bogging down.

The French Press Agency is reporting that, "... there had been by sharp exchanges over what the document should include and whether it should reflect findings published after a cut-off date for new material."

The Australian Age is reporting that the report "... has been watered down as a result of influence from government officials from countries opposed to taking radical action."

We have a copy of the pre-negotiation report and will be comparing it to the final publicly released document to be issued this Saturday, November 17.

Stay tuned.

 

 

 

What's next?

Ground rules?

The IPCC cut-off deadline for new information on climate change for their reports seems rather foolish...no, very foolish.
AGW doesn't seem to obeying any sort of "deadline"!?
Is there a valid reason for this or is there a restriction placed on them by politics?

Perhaps they are concerned

Perhaps they are concerned that without a firm deadline release of the reports (and any positive action that might result) would be delayed while material trickled in over time. Or that contributors would be less committed to meeting the deadline. It can be problematic. And material that misses the deadline can always be released independently in journals as "addenda".

I see your point...

I guess that even if some information missed the boat, at least the boat left the dock.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependant upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!

Desmogblog monthly
book give-away

Enter now to win this month’s book Anthony Barnosky's Heatstroke: Nature in an age of global warming

CHECK IT OUT

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!

Join One of DeSmog's Facebook Groups Today!
Did you know DeSmog has some very active Facebook Groups? Check them out:

Friends of DeSmogBlog

The Arctic Front

The Environment is My Voting Issue in Canada

Expedition Earth

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers