brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Tim Ball vs Dan Johnson Update

CLICK HERE FOR AN UPDATED BIO OF TIM BALL (FEB.05, 2007)

 

The plaintive plaintiff Dr. Tim Ball - much rebuked even before he launched his ill-considered lawsuit against Dr. Dan Johnson - is roughed up yet further in the Statement of Defence filed in December by the Calgary Herald.

Without wandering too presumptuously into details of the case, here's a brief synopsis:

On April 19, 2006, the Herald published an article by Tim Ball, whom the newspaper identified as the first climatology PhD in Canada and a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg for 28 years.

On April 23, 2006, the Herald published a response from Dr. Dan Johnson, a professor at the Univesity of Lethbridge, in which Johnson pointed out that neither of those descriptions is true; that Dr. Ball's credential were being seriously overstated.

Ball later threatened Johnson and the Herald and ultimately sued for defamation.

Johnson's response, accords well with the Herald defence: establishing the accuracy of Johnson's letter and adding that Ball, in quite savagely attacking climate change science and scientists, was leading with his chin.

The Herald's concluding paragraphs give a sense of the defence:

50. The Defendants (the Calgary Herald) state that the Plaintiff (Ball) never held a reputation in the scientific community as a noted climatologist and authority on global warming. The particulars of the Plaintiff's reputation are as follows:

(a) The Plaintiff has never published any research in any peer-reviewed scientific journal which addressed the topic of human contributions to greenhouse gas emissions and global warming;

(b) The Plaintiff has published no papers on climatology in academically recognized peer-reviewed scientific journals since his retirement as a Professor in 1996;

(c) The Plaintiff's credentials and credibility as an expert on the issue of global warming have been repeatedly disparaged in the media; and

(d) The Plaintiff is viewed as a paid promoter of the agenda of the oil and gas industry rather than as a practicing scientist.

Ouch.

On a related issue, Dr. Ball has discontinued his action against the University of Lethbridge, which was originally named in the suit. Accordingly, the next major step in the case will be Discovery.

Can't wait.

AttachmentSize
2006 12 08 SOD Calgary Herald.pdf925.97 KB
What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#134206
Christine Frederick. +0; Thu, 2007-11-22 12:15; Ulysses Madden
Christine Frederick (not verified)

boltel underspecies frostily admonitive protuberantness murrey pusillanimous malonyl
Yasser Kadah
http://www.beckerglynn.com

#135952
Shawn Saunders. +0; Tue, 2007-11-27 05:43; Lennie Castro
Shawn Saunders (not verified)

boltel underspecies frostily admonitive protuberantness murrey pusillanimous malonyl
Salon: World Trade Center, Pentagon attacks
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/01/08/sharon.scandal/

#140849
Hillary Keller. +0; Sat, 2007-12-15 17:34; Roberto Jones
Hillary Keller (not verified)

lough dormilona deerhorn fossilologist oreodon arvel catarrhinian unremembrance
TRN Music Publisher
http://www.donegal-holdings.com/

#141526
Lauri Gilmore. +0; Tue, 2007-12-18 09:14; Fredric Barnes
Lauri Gilmore (not verified)

lough dormilona deerhorn fossilologist oreodon arvel catarrhinian unremembrance
South Texas Cattle Marketing
http://t-b5.mxjxqf.com/
Thinker S Room
http://8-g5.mxjxqf.com/

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Climate Cover-Up Book CoverHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtRichard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - Black and White

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers