brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Top environmental groups denounce BC's New Democratic Party

On the eve of an election campaign in British Columbia, three of Canada's leading enviromental organizations held a press conference on Tuesday condemning a New Democratic Party promise to let B.C. polluters off the hook, despite the damage that might do to the environment or the economy.

The David Suzuki Foundation, the Pembina Institute and Forest Ethics jointly stated that "thousands of jobs in the green economy will be lost, and the province will lose its position as an environmental leader if the (first North American carbon) tax is dropped."

"The NDP has chosen what they think will be a publicly acceptable but climate-irresponsible approach. And that is, they want to step backward the pricing of carbon and backwards on the policies that are in place in the hopes that that may get them elected," Merran Smith, a climate director with ForestEthics, said Monday.

The carbon tax, passed by the reigning Liberal government last spring and implemented (awkwardly) just as oil prices peaked last July, has been hailed in environmental and economics circles as the fairest, most comprehensive and most transparent tax on fossil fuel pollution. The NDP alternative, on the other hand, was roundly criticized, most recently by the renowned BC economist, Dr. Marc Jaccard, who estimated that the NDP's own plan for climate change could cost the province as many as 60,000 jobs by 2020.

As the Globe and Mail reported,

"The environmental alliance, which also includes the David Suzuki Foundation and ForestEthics, stopped short of telling voters to re-elect the Liberals to a third term. '“We didn't say the Liberals are the greatest thing since sliced bread,' said Merran Smith of ForestEthics."

But the environmental movement appears unanimous that it would like the NDP to rethink what appears to be a completely cynical (and economically suspect) attack on the most progressive climate change policy on the continent. Such a change of heart appears highly unlikely, and the Liberals have risen to the challenge by trying (for example, with the dedication Tuesday of two new protected wildlife areas) to bolster their environmental credentials in other areas, as well.

Full Globe and Mail article: Environmentalists vow to punish NDP for plan to dismantle B.C.'s carbon tax

 

This article is another in Desmogblog's ongoing coverage of the British Columbia 2009 election. We believe this is key election in the history of Climate Change policy in North America. Click here to read more about why we are are covering this election in such detail.
What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#704495
Peter Moss. +1; Wed, 2009-04-15 09:44; Sad but true

The NDP must now be bleeding support from its more green-minded members. Their embarrasing environmental policies are about as sustainable as their climate projections. Carol James better have a nice comfortable opposition seat, because she's going to be sitting in it for a while.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
James Hoggan - Black and WhiteHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtClimate Cover-Up Book CoverRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers