“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



Tucker Carlson’s 'Daily Caller' Website Bankrolled by Climate Change Denier

The primary funder of Tucker Carlson’s new website ‘The Daily Caller’ is climate change denier and GOP bankroller Foster Friess, and Carlson has reportedly lined up sponsorship from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Mining Association and Southern Company, all major opponents of meaningful action to curb climate change.

Friess donated $3 million to Carlson’s site, which is run out of an office a “stone’s throw from the White House” by a 21-person staff.  ‘The Daily Caller’ is the brainchild (if you can call it that) of Carlson and his college roommate Neil Patel, a former Dick Cheney aide.  The site’s opinion editor is former RNC press secretary Moira Bagley, immediately calling into question Carlson’s insistence that ‘The Daily Caller’ won’t cater to the right-wing crowd.

Howard Kurtz reports in today’s Washington Post that “Carlson insists this won’t be a right-wing site” and quotes Carlson saying “We’re not enforcing any kind of ideological orthodoxy on anyone.”

But Kurtz notes that:
When he announced the Daily Caller last spring, Carlson was more explicit about its ideology, telling Human Events the site would be “opposed to what’s going on” under President Obama — “a radical increase in federal power … a version of socialism.”

Kurtz describes Friess as “an investment magnate and a Christian philanthropist” who has donated $689,000 to Republican organizations and the Bush presidential campaigns over the last decade.  Friess has “gone hunting with Cheney” (oh boy) and “is a man of many opinions.”

One of those “opinions” is that much of the information on global warming is “distorted and manipulated,” according to Friess.

Josh Nelson over at EnviroKnow has compiled a quick rundown of Friess’s opinions on climate change and a list of recent items from Friess’s blog, such as this gem: “Global Warming a religion?”

Given their sources of funding, won’t it be interesting to hear what Carlson and company have to say when it comes to the subject of climate change?



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How can anyone even question whether or not Tucker Carlson might be involved in anything that's unbiased. Has he ever shown the ability to be unbiased in anything he's ever done professionally? Why should he start now?

The New York Times is running a piece about a supposed conspiracy to subvert the peer review process w/regard to climate science, as reported to the insurance industry in a letter from an insurance industry trade group.

http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2010/01/13/13climatewire-insurance-group-says-stolen-e-mails-show-ris-91554.html

If you take a look at Steve McIntyre's site, I think you'll understand where this is coming from:

http://climateaudit.org/2010/01/05/climategatekeeping-the-nature-intervention/

A nice example of runaway feedback. I think most people viewing McIntyre's train of thought will find it incredible, but nonetheless this story now has traction in the press.

"If the day one of Tucker Carlson's mavericky money pit The Daily Caller is any indication, the talent pool on the journalistic right has become a foot bath, or perhaps a finger bowl"

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/wolcott/2010/01/the-daily-caller-where-laughter-goes-to-die.html

Personally I think Mr. Wolcott is being too kind.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.