brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



U.K. Court Coverage: A Clean Kill for Climate Confusion

Media Matters has a nice wrap on how the U.S. mainstream media covered the U.K. High Court decision that approved An Inconvenient Truth for continued broadcast in U.K. schools.

In a few cases, the news slipped through that the judge had actually rejected Stewart Dimmock's request to block the movie's broadcast or insist that it be accompanied by trashy "balancing" videos (The Great Global Warming Swindle, anyone?). But mostly, papers just reported that Al Gore had been caught out overstating the case.

You have to be impressed when a disppointed plaintiff can spin a court loss that successfully. But equally, you have to wonder, did any of those reporters actually read the judgment?

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#126256
Stefan. +0; Wed, 2007-10-17 09:20; The GGWS
Stefan (not verified)

If it ever does come to The Great Global Warming Swindle being shown in classrooms, it would probably be worth chipping in to have that taken to court and analysed for accuracy :D

#126265
Kevin Grandia. +1; Wed, 2007-10-17 09:42; Even better

I know there is a very comprehensive and absolutely scathing complaint that was submitted to OFCOMM over the Swindle originally being aired on Channel 4 in the UK. 

Should be interesting to see what the judgement is there. I hate this whole idea of judging science in the courtroom, but if it comes to that and its the only option, then yes, we should raise a bunch of $$. 

#126270
FEMACK. +1; Wed, 2007-10-17 10:00; Cough it up, Kev!

How about a link to that "scathing complaint"?

#127105
climate criminal. +1; Sun, 2007-10-21 21:01; TGGWS OFCOM Complaint

Femack,
This is it.
http://www.climateofdenial.net/?q=node/3

#127267
climate criminal. +1; Tue, 2007-10-23 00:13; Court & Legal Costs

Has anyone heard who paid the costs?
Since Dimwit Dimmock lost, presumably his sponsor will have to shell-out for the court & legal costs.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Climate Cover-Up Book CoverRichard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - ColourJames Hoggan - Black and White

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers