brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



U.S., China intransigence threatens global-warming pact at APEC

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders have been working on a draft that would reaffirm a UN treaty on climate change and set non-binding targets for cutting greenhouse-gas emissions. The statement would also set targets requiring APEC members to increase energy efficiency by 25 per cent by 2030.

Industrialized economies, led by host Australia and the U.S., want to forge a new framework outside the UN-backed Kyoto Protocol, which sets specific goals for reducing emissions. The Bush administration refused to ratify Kyoto, the world's first treaty to set targets for greenhouse-gas reductions. China, which as a developing country was exempted from having to make cuts under Kyoto, says it will not sacrifice economic growth to fight climate change.

So the nations representing two-thirds of world greenhouse-gas emissions have essentially hijacked the APEC forum. The U.S. has come under widespread international and domestic criticism for its position, but not China, which recently overtook the U.S. as the world’s top producer of carbon emissions.

APEC leaders are still grappling over the statement, and the North-South divide doesn’t bode well for the final draft.

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#117527
Simon D.. +0; Fri, 2007-09-07 11:47; Is failure at APEC a bad thing?
Simon D. (not verified)

The draft plan includes no actual emissions targets. It suggests countries create 'aspirational' non-binding emissions goals. The only actual requirement would be a 25% decrease in energy intensity (energy use/$GDP) by 2030. As I've been blogging about of late, energy intensity has been declining for decades because energy use does not keep up with economic production. In fact, the global energy intensity actually decreased by 26% from 1985 to 1995. The required decrease is, at best, business as usual.

So maybe it is best that APEC fails. Else this climate change "mitigation-light" could destroy the serious UN effort.

#117562
Kevin Grandia. +1; Fri, 2007-09-07 14:39; voluntary standards

Don't work and send the wrong message to industry who need a bottom line and fair playing field to make long-term financial decisions. Voluntary emissions standards are an exercise in PR. 

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Richard LittlemoreJames Hoggan - Black and WhiteHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtJames Hoggan - Colour

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers