brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



US coal jobs bleeding while renewable technology booms worldwide

While coal industry mouthpieces like the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity tout coal as the second-coming of Jesus for the United States, the latest Vital Signs report shows that coal industry employment has fallen by half in the last 20 years, despite a one-third increase in production. 

According to the new report out today by the Worldwatch Institute, a transition to renewable energy sources promises significant global job gains at a time when the coal industry has been hemorrhaging jobs for years.

An estimated 2.3 million people worldwide currently work either directly in renewables or indirectly in supplier industries. The solar thermal industry employs at least 624,000 people, the wind power industry 300,000, and the solar PV industry 170,000. More than 1 million people work in the biomass and biofuels sector, while small-scale hydropower employs 39,000 individuals and geothermal employs 25,000.

These figures are expected to swell substantially as private investment and government support for alternative energy sources grow.

Will the US finally wake up and smell the opportunity of a cleaner energy sector?

Jeff Biggers on the Huffington Post points to the coal-grown Appalachian region in West Virginia as a potential boom-town for wind power:

If Senator Barack Obama ever needs a living symbol of change we can believe in, and a hopeful way to transcend the dirty politics of our failed energy policies, he should go and see the future of renewable energy in the Coal River Valley in West Virginia."

 

 

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#399715
Gary. +0; Fri, 2008-07-11 08:51; Off topic; sorry
Gary (not verified)
James Hansen, like Al Gore, refuses offer to defend his position in debate before a university body . Hmmmmmmm. 
#399722
Kevin Grandia. +1; Fri, 2008-07-11 09:20; Dr. Patrick Michaels can

Dr. Patrick Michaels can debate science, where science is debated... in the peer reviewed journals. As a scientist if Michaels wants to convince his peers with evidence that he has every opportunity to do so through with rigorous, robust research findings. That's how science works.

#399820
r to the o to the b. +0; Fri, 2008-07-11 16:48; Oh?
r to the o to the b (not verified)

If "that's how science works", then why does James Hoggan & Associates PR INC. find it necessary to stick their nose in and act as shills?

#400013
VJ. +1; Sat, 2008-07-12 09:34; They work to counter the
VJ

They work to counter the people who lie to non-scientists about what the science is saying. People who are not scientists often have no idea of how scientists work.

#400024
ROB. +0; Sat, 2008-07-12 10:37; So what you are saying is ...
ROB (not verified)

... your idea of science depends on PR spin instead of facts.

Thanks for clearing that up.

#401288
VJ. +1; Sun, 2008-07-13 10:51; Rob: Illiterate or
VJ

Rob: Illiterate or dishonest? Let the intelligent reader decide.

#401572
rob. +0; Sun, 2008-07-13 13:54; Ouch! Another legendary VJ zinger!
rob (not verified)

"Rob: Illiterate or dishonest? Let the intelligent reader decide."

When "the intelligent reader" figures it out, please let VJ know.

#399750
Gary. +0; Fri, 2008-07-11 12:40; Actually
Gary (not verified)

Hansen and Gore are simply scared of being humiliated. Terrified in fact

#401577
rob. +0; Sun, 2008-07-13 13:56; Wouldn't you be?
rob (not verified)

What? You expect them to risk killing their golden goose? They might end up having to get real jobs?

#399753
John Mashey. +1; Fri, 2008-07-11 12:54; Debates

Debates are about the dumbest way imaginable to do science.

1) Anything serious wants graphs, not just words.

2) But whether with words or graphs, it is WAY, WAY easier to cherry-pick and generate confusion and doubts in an audience than to generate clarity.

I've seen people write short articles or letters-to-editors in which they've managed to include a dozen or so of the arguments listed in http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php .

Every one of those arguments would be wrong, long-ago debunked, with plenty of scientific references. But it takes far less time to throw all those arguments up in the hope that one or more of them sticks with a listener, than it takes to carefully and patiently debunk each one so that a general audience understands. There's probably an inherent 10:1 or 20:1 ratio.

All it takes to "win" a debate is to generate 10 wrong arugments and hope that an audience member worries about one of them.

Just go down the list above and you'll see what I mean.

#704755
MakenzieB. +1; Tue, 2009-04-28 01:07; The merger of Sun

The merger of Sun Microsystems and Oracle Corp is something to look out for. IBM was in talks and appeared on the verge of closing the deal, but negotiations fell apart.  Now it will become half of Oracle Sun, but it will likely mean layoffs, as any large merger usually does.  Payday loans to buy stock in Oracle may not be the greatest idea, since the stock has dropped almost a dollar since the news broke.  However, this goes a long way for credit repair for the Sun sale, into Oracle Sun.

#711696
jerald. +1; Mon, 2009-12-21 02:07; Every airline, big and small,

Every airline, big and small, needs administrative support staff to keep the office running smoothly.

Germany Jobs

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
James Hoggan - Black and WhiteJames Hoggan - ColourHoggan, Robertson, HarcourtRichard Littlemore

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers