“An exposé of planetary scale.”
~JAMES E. HANSEN  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



US Congressional stalwart invites Gore to testify on global warming

The drive for action that has seen four major bills offered in the Senate, and big companies and utilities like General Electric, Alcoa and PG&E of California joining hands, has been augmented by a letter to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce from its new chairman saying he would put climate change at the top of the agenda and invite Al Gore to testify first.

A New York Times editorial said Gore should quickly accept. The support of committee-chair and Michigan Democrat John Dingell will be essential to any real progress on curbing carbon emissions.

“In recent years, serious discussion of climate change has been largely confined to the Senate,” the Times editorial said. “But laws must be passed by both chambers, and if anything is to happen in the House, it will need Mr. Dingell’s participation and consent.”

Dingell, 80, is a veteran of 51 years in the House who has played a pivotal role in pushing through nearly every cornerstone environmental law, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and laws protecting wilderness and endangered species.

Although he supported fuel economy standards years ago, his loyalties to Detroit have led him to oppose further restrictions. As for global warming, he has said he needs to be convinced the consequences are truly worth worrying about, and if they are, that the problem can be addressed without bankrupting the country.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
As much as I believe Gore is passionate and serious about wanting to educate others on Global Warming, I don’t believe he should be testifying before congress. He is not a Scientist, and i doubt even he understands the complexities of the issue. (although he probably understands much more than the average politician) Instead Congress should be asking scientists who have recently had peer reviewed papers published in scientific journals explain why the scientific community believes what it does about global warming.

You are absolutely right !!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

FOLLOW US!
 
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR E-NEWSLETTER
Get our Top 5 stories in your inbox weekly.
DESMOG TIP JAR
Help us clear the PR pollution that clouds climate science.

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.


www.know-the-number.com

Our Climate is Changing!
Please download Flash Player.