Washington Post Teams with Dirty Coal Front Group ACCCE on PostPolitics.com Launch

Thu, 2010-04-29 18:17Brendan DeMelle
Brendan DeMelle's picture

Washington Post Teams with Dirty Coal Front Group ACCCE on PostPolitics.com Launch

The Washington Post this week launched a new politics homepage, PostPolitics.com, with a helping hand from the dirty coal industry.

According to the press release announcing the launch,
“The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity is the Washington Post’s exclusive launch sponsor of PostPolitics.com.”

While PostPolitics.com itself is an exciting new tool for fans of political news, it is unfortunate that the Post had to partner with coal polluters to fund the launch.

So far, the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity (ACCCE) is sure getting some bang for however many bucks it is shelling out.  Go visit the PostPolitics.com homepage right now and admire the massive “Clean Coal” banner ads at the top and right side, featuring ACCCE’s poster miner Shane Evans, a mine dispatcher at Arch Coal’s Thunder Basin Coal Company.  (Finally, the coal industry has taken to featuring an actual miner in its ads, after learning a tough lesson last year when Adfero’s “FACES of Coal” ad campaign was discovered to be full of iStockPhoto images of actors.)

Doling out big bucks on advertising isn’t a new tactic for ACCCE by any means.  The coal industry’s main mouthpiece has an annual budget of at least $45 million, which it uses to land full page ads in such widely-read outlets as CQ Weekly, Roll Call, Politico, and, of course, The Washington Post

ACCCE’s extensive and expensive efforts to buy itself primo ad space have previously landed it in partnership with CNN. ACCCE’s predecessor group, Americans for Balanced Energy Choices (ABEC), co-sponsored six of the ’08 presidential debates along with ACCCE for a cool $5 million payment.  

Grist noted at the time of those debates that no questions about climate change were ever asked of the participants, calling into question whether there was undue influence on the forums thanks to the coal advertising dollars.

Will the same thing happen with PostPolitics.com? Will coal get special treatment in coverage of the climate policy debate?  Will climate change be adequately covered on PostPolitics.com?  Only time will tell.

The press release announcing the launch of PostPolitics.com notes that the site aims to be “an authority you can trust,” and Washington Post Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli urges political junkies to “bookmark PostPolitics or make it your homepage.”

Sorry Mr. Brauchli,  I’ll wait until Shane Evans and the ACCCE ads are replaced with something, anything, besides mythical suggestions of “clean coal.”

Comments

Grist noted when discussing the issue of climate change has never been asked by the participants to question whether there was undue influence on the forums through advertising worth of coal.

melatonin supplement

[x]
A U.S. District Court judge ruled on June 27 that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Forest Service both wrongly approved expansion of the West Elk coal mine in Somerset, Colo., because they failed to take into account the economic impacts greenhouse gas emissions from the mining would have.
 
The federal agencies said it was impossible to quantify such impacts, but the court pointed out a tool is...
read more