brought to you by www.energyboom.com
 
“An imperative read for a successful future.”
~LEONARDO DICAPRIO  
 
Clearing the PR Pollution that Clouds Climate Science

Desmog Video

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


 



White House Press Secretary Fumbles on Climate Science Censorship Report

If you're going to lie, at least be honest about it.

During today's press briefing White House press secretary, Dana Perino, spun herself into a knot with her own bafflegab in response to a Congress Committee investigative report released today.

The report, submitted by Oversight Committee chair, Henry A Waxman outlines a "...systematic effort to manipulate climate change science and mislead policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming."

Press Secretary Perino brushed off the report stating that the claims were "untrue."

Of course, Perino's denial would have been a little more convincing if she had first not admitted that she hadn't even read the report. At the outset of questioning Perino stated that, "[she'd] seen reports about the report, and [she] hasn't seen the Minority report..."

Here's a transcript of the exchange with reporters:

Q The House Oversight Committee has come out with its bipartisan investigation -- several months in the making -- saying it is inescapable to conclude that the Bush administration engaged in a systematic effort to manipulate the climate change science and mislead the policymakers and the public about the dangers of global warming. Have you seen the report and can that --

MS. PERINO: I've seen reports about the report, and I haven't seen the Minority report in terms of -- when you say it's bipartisan, I would challenge that and encourage people to look at the Minority report. I think that it's inescapable that they issued this report on a day when they knew that the United States would be represented at the Bali conference, where we are currently talking about the next step for a framework after 2012, which is when Kyoto would end.

And the President started leading on that back many years ago, but especially if you point -- look to one thing that was really key this year in the climate change debate is the President bringing together the meeting of the major economies on September 30th, here at the State Department, where he had the major economies of the world come together and all agreed that they should work forward, because we understand the urgent challenge that is posed by climate change. And I would submit to you, having worked on these issues for a long time, that it's rehashed rhetoric that has come out of the Democrats beforehand, and we just reject it as being untrue.

Q Do you think -- you don't think it was released today because the United States is accepting a Nobel Peace Prize for work on climate change?

MS. PERINO: Well, I guess -- I didn't even know today's Nobel Peace Prize was going to happen, in terms of those awards. But clearly, we've been in Bali for the last week, and today is really important -- the next three days in Bali are very important because it's at the foreign minister level, or environmental minister level.

Q Did the White House ever asked employees at agencies like NOAA to suppress climate change information and science?

MS. PERINO: Not that I'm aware and I do not believe that is true.

 

What's next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
#139800
John Lefebvre. +1; Mon, 2007-12-10 17:04; GWB couldn't have said it better

Now here's a lady with a tough gig. Actually given the facts she has to work with she expresses the views of her leadership with remarkable exactitude....don't you think? Mr. Bush couldn't have said it better....

About the climate cover-up

About the climate cover-up

Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.

There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.

Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.

Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Like what you read here? Get our top five stories in your inbox every week. » here's a preview
Enter your email and subscribe now!



DeSmog Tip Jar

DeSmog Tip Jar

Flickr Photos

Flickr Photos
Hoggan, Robertson, HarcourtJames Hoggan - Black and WhiteClimate Cover-Up Book CoverJames Hoggan - Colour

Member of the Progressive Bloggers Network

MEMBER OF THE PROGRESSIVE BLOGGERS NETWORK

Progressive Bloggers