Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.
There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.
Although all public relations professionals are bound by a duty to not knowingly mislead the public, some have executed comprehensive campaigns of misinformation on behalf of industry clients on issues ranging from tobacco and asbestos to seat belts.
Lately, these fringe players have turned their efforts to creating confusion about climate change. This PR campaign could not be accomplished without the compliance of media as well as the assent and participation of leaders in government and business.
This is amusing indeed.
This shelf, which is less than .1 percent of the total area of ICE in Antarctica, is cracking in the dead of winter in temperatures in the negative 100 range and you want people to believe it is caused by Glo-BULL warming?
BTW: Antarctica ice area is approaching another all time record high.
the first breakup of the Wilkins shelf started well before March of this year.
But hey, why let reality get in the way of expressing a perfectly ignorant opinion.
that this particular, unique little neck of ice is all that's holding back a direct interface between glaciers and the open sea. If the sea ice breaks loose and no longer forms a brake, the glaciers can begin to accelerate the way they are doing in Greenland. It may represent a miniscule part of the ice cover, but this isn't about sheer area. The bridge performs a function far beyond what .1% would suggest. And if it can do this in the winter, imagine what might happen when summer rolls around.
Everything is held in place by a delicate balance. Upset the balance, even a little, and the whole thing could come crashing down. That's what feedback is all about. They are thinking now that they have been underestimating the impact that ocean temperature has on sea ice, focussing mainly on air temperature (surface melt). The sea will continue to warm as more and more dark open water is exposed to absorb sunlight in the summer. That warmer water finds its way under the pack ice and eats away at it from below while warmer air does its work from above -- double whammy.
You can only beat your head against the wall for so long, Gary, until you notice the writing on it. Pay attention.
As for the surface area of ice, a skin of ice is no indication of anything.
Fern Mackenzie
Todd, you are relatively new at DeSmog. Can you tell us a bit more why you do your treks? Is it only to promote action on AGW or are you alos an adventure lover?
I believe you said you are going to take a solo trek to the Antarctic. How long will it take? How do you sleep overnight at a place like that, etc.? What do you do if say a medical emergency arises or other difficulties?
Thanks,