Bush White House was Willfully Blind to Arctic Ice Melt

Tue, 2009-07-28 17:00Mitchell Anderson
Mitchell Anderson's picture

Bush White House was Willfully Blind to Arctic Ice Melt

During the eight years the Bush Administration denied that climate change was a problem, they were concealing spy satellite images showing the frightening loss of summer artic sea ice.

The de-classified images were released last week by the Obama Whitehouse in an effort to build support for the beleaguered Waxman Markey bill now moving through the Senate.

The satellite pictures clearly show how rapidly the arctic is vanishing due to climate change. In years such as 2007, more than one million square kilometers of summer ice disappeared and has never recovered.

The one-meter resolution images produced by the military spy satellites were far better than anything available to the world’s climate scientists. Too bad that few other than the military and the oil friendly Bush Administration ever saw them - until now.

NASA researcher Thorsten Markus of the Goddard Space Flight Center is thrilled to finally have access to better images than have ever been made available to climate experts. “One meter resolution is that dimension that has been missing…that is why web are so thrilled about it.”

Previous images available to researchers provided up to 30 times less detail, hiding much detail vital to predict the pace of climate change in the arctic.sat image

Summer sea ice not only provides critical habitat for keystone species like polar bears, it also reflects enormous amounts of solar radiation back into space. Scientists now worry that as more white ice becomes dark water, the artic ocean will heat faster as more energy is absorbed by open water.

In an ideal (or even OK) world, other federal agencies like NASA or NOAA would have sufficient resources to produce similar images. However the Bush Administration conveniently slashed funding to Earth observation programs outside the military that might have produced pesky data revealing the brisk pace of climate change.

A recent report from the National Academies of Science showed that the Earth observing satellite capacity was in danger of collapse.

Desmog Blog readers will also recall our long and unfinished quest to reveal why the $100 million Deep Space Climate Observatory was never launched even though it was fully built eight years ago and has been sitting in a box ever since. It seems the Bush war on climate science continues to inflict damage to this day.

The Obama Whitehouse is playing catch-up on US science funding, though he is hobbled by years of willful Washington neglect and a now-crippled economy. This spring, he allocated $170 million in federal stimulus spending to improve climate modeling.

The head of the US’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Professor Jane Lubchenco, warned that the gathering of satellite data - crucial to predicting future climate changes - was now at “great risk” because America’s ageing satellite fleet was not being replaced.

This is obviously no accident. Not only did Washington deliberately not invest in climate science, we now know they concealed vital information from their own scientists.

This latest incredible example illustrates how far the some vested interests will go to hide the truth about climate change. In this case, those vested interests just happened to occupy the highest office in the land.

 

Comments

George W Bush is a war junkie..in fact Bush Administration is War Criminal..never interested in climate change or global warming…

Bush would have had more wars if could have. I think if Iraq would have gone as planned he would have quickly moved on to Iran and the North Korea. That was his “Axis of Evil”

Well the war in Iraq didn’t go as planned exactly and so Iran and NK never happened.

Now we have a world where crazy regimes in Iran and NK have or are about to have nuclear weapons and it’s too late to do anything about it.

Bush loved going to war and dismantling opportunities for dictators to have nukes. He mostly failed.

This is not willfully blind. This is willfully deceitful.

For the record, there tends to be almost no sea ice in Barrow, Alaska during the month of July. Going back into the records for Barrow, Alaska, I can find images of no ice cover for 2005, 2004, etc. during July.

The satellite image in question for 2006 was taken between July 7th and July 12th 2006. For the majority of the rest of the month of July 2006, there was little to no ice cover, very similar to 2007. And in July 20007, there were days of almost complete ice cover, it just depended what day a person looked at.

Moving to July 2008, there is almost complete ice coverage in Barrow, Alaska on July 2, 2008 and nearly zero ice coverage on July 22, 2008. By July 30th, ice coverage is heavy again. So a single satellite picture can not be considered indicative of a whole month.

These photos are really bad science. The photos have been cherry-picked to support a predetermined conclusion. A proper look at the data would demand, at a minimum, satellite photos for each day of July before any type of basic assessment could be made. Instead, we get propaganda.

ALL of your references are from post-2000. Why don’t we have a look at ten-year intervals going back 50 years?
[x]
A U.S. District Court judge ruled on June 27 that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Forest Service both wrongly approved expansion of the West Elk coal mine in Somerset, Colo., because they failed to take into account the economic impacts greenhouse gas emissions from the mining would have.
 
The federal agencies said it was impossible to quantify such impacts, but the court pointed out a tool is...
read more